Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
about
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproductionTime-lapse systems for embryo incubation in assisted reproductionClinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic reviewEmbryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoringTime-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysisUnaltered timing of embryo development in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): a time-lapse study.Morphokinetic parameters of early embryo development via time lapse monitoring and their effect on embryo selection and ICSI outcomes: a prospective cohort study.Microwells support high-resolution time-lapse imaging and development of preimplanted mouse embryos.Non-invasive methods for embryo selectionDay three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Label free cell-tracking and division detection based on 2D time-lapse images for lineage analysis of early embryo developmentRelative kinetic expressions defining cleavage synchronicity are better predictors of blastocyst formation and quality than absolute time points.Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trialsAnalysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles.Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytesAssessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?Abnormal early cleavage events predict early embryo demise: sperm oxidative stress and early abnormal cleavage.Time-lapse in the IVF-lab: how should we assess potential benefit?More than just a matter of time.Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experienceMorphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study.Preliminary trials of a specific gravity technique in the determination of early embryo growth potential†.Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre studyThe impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging-a retrospective observational studyOvarian stimulation with human and recombinant gonadotropin - comparison of in vitro fertilization efficiency with use of time-lapse monitoringSelecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo originAbnormally cleaving embryos are able to produce live births: a time-lapse study.Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope(TM)) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot studyDevelopment of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3A prospective randomized comparison of early embryo cleavage kinetics between two media culture systems.Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.How should we choose the 'best' embryo? A commentary on behalf of the British Fertility Society and the Association of Clinical Embryologists.Mammalian pre-implantation chromosomal instability: species comparison, evolutionary considerations, and pathological correlations.A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection.Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse.Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review.National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories.
P2860
Q24187931-24026C70-D05D-4BD4-B4E4-21EB99F434D3Q24193971-07A6BF1B-FA77-4345-8E42-DD5543D679F2Q26827106-A8272EDC-2C15-48A8-BE0B-94E8AA07E343Q26995448-4470DF38-1701-4432-8156-ED9DA0FCB6A6Q27024813-BBE3EFAA-5416-4D10-ABEB-CC8A16ADF4B7Q27316069-DDE47860-26E0-41E1-B21C-64DA54D029AEQ27316140-AFC30C09-A86F-4E6F-9454-A471499966BAQ27331634-32968EB1-FAA3-4005-B858-C1EE2C58A8C0Q28067249-186C115F-18F3-45E1-B412-4DAF81371412Q30240089-9A18D21F-16AD-4044-A794-A9D43E0D0C5FQ30583603-803484E0-9D12-4A4F-A96D-9469F7F03A2FQ30615610-F0A6BFDA-22F4-453D-A0CB-6116D08A423DQ33752021-D8D4CCC9-69BD-4AB3-A66B-908D786AF782Q33820389-23FA2E5C-A740-4AF4-B8E4-C8ED71D98BFDQ33830129-966B89C9-25D7-4FCA-9809-5ED5EBFA84A5Q34145778-F4189393-795A-43F6-B8E7-F0BB6732C75FQ34326058-F4C56960-3CDF-45E8-BD7A-9D92BE793832Q34443574-A9FA7996-E4FA-4469-BAA7-7971A3F80527Q34817688-1BE2FFBD-DA68-4177-A6BF-476149B13D8BQ34962700-DCEE9B1E-8027-45F0-B22A-F6DD0AD1D62DQ35938114-C8C40230-2C3C-4034-BA05-780C77DC718DQ35974868-2C94CDBB-5DF3-45C1-A7AF-DCC3B6007A02Q36073972-1DC9A132-5208-406B-8B9F-63143AD594E8Q36297186-F07D9757-47B1-4F5C-82FD-F8D97460C6FEQ36370204-7BA13D4D-1D30-4809-BB6A-77041DA7C0C1Q36390301-71780292-70E0-4F71-AAAE-373E0F3EE7AAQ36473758-18FC1DC8-F7B4-47CD-8DE7-61865F3C130BQ36670014-30BD5E81-B5BA-45A6-BC1A-FF3214D93773Q37199579-B9F732E7-CE2C-4768-8A51-116AEC3E9A69Q37265390-1D5C89EE-2C2D-48FE-903D-8A5D97D06169Q37563095-C28D1B5C-1DF7-4E48-8735-E9FEFAAB30A7Q38310795-78A05D77-F6B6-45CD-BD1B-48304AAC9106Q38575047-E759D657-9060-4073-9740-BC939CEFC8ABQ38586272-A722B107-0BAD-478F-9AC5-321F524B2489Q38602018-65F63BA6-1A96-41CF-A6A7-3EE5FD26C63EQ38602021-C289061E-E354-4F1E-BFAC-B290D7C4F924Q38608132-E15EA780-AFD5-4B66-B2A3-5B44DC50F087Q38641797-F8C5FDE2-A5E2-4449-966B-139868808B05Q38651746-E653073B-E92F-4B07-92D6-05525A5632DEQ38732971-F445AFD6-DEE7-45FF-8D64-52A0A15A877E
P2860
Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@en
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@nl
type
label
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@en
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@nl
prefLabel
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@en
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Improving embryo selection usi ...... prospective multicenter trial.
@en
P2093
Alice A Chen
G David Adamson
Joe Conaghan
Kevin E Loewke
Kristen Ivani
Marina Gvakharia
Mary E Abusief
Philip E Chenette
Robert Boostanfar
Shehua Shen
P304
P356
10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2013.04.021
P407
P577
2013-05-28T00:00:00Z