Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
about
General practitioners' conceptions about treatment of depression and factors that may influence their practice in this area. A postal survey.Maximising response from GPs to questionnaire surveys: do length or incentives make a difference?Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population.General practitioners' use and experiences of palliative care services: a survey in south east England.International health policy survey in 11 countries: assessment of non-response bias in the Norwegian sample.Comparing health-related quality of life of Dutch and Chinese patients with traumatic brain injury: do cultural differences play a role?Planning training seminars in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey on the preferences of general practitioners and nurses in AustriaNon-response in a survey of physicians on end-of-life care for the elderly.Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problemsAnti-smoking advice from general practitioners: is a population-based approach to advice-giving feasible?Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.Hormone replacement therapy: the views of general practitioners and practice nurses'So much post, so busy with practice--so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveysHow common is medical training in palliative care? A postal survey of general practitioners.Counsellors in primary care in Southampton: a questionnaire survey of their qualifications, working arrangements, and casemixThe Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2).Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveysMultidisciplinary assessment of vision in children with neurological disability.Feasibility Study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Iran.Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol.Are joint health plans effective for coordination of health services? An analysis based on theory and Danish pre-reform results.Interdisciplinary cooperation of GPs in palliative care at home: a nationwide survey in The NetherlandsDomestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare cliniciansManagement of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in UK primary care: a survey of general practitioners.Does a public single payer system deliver integrated care? A national survey study among professional stakeholders in DenmarkPositive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitionersEffects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-trainingDoes flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons.Nursery sickness policies and their influence on prescribing for conjunctivitis: audit and questionnaire surveyDelayed antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections in children under primary care: Physicians' views.Obtaining the views of general practitioners on the services to which they refer patients--a locality approach.When questionnaire response rates do matter: a survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes.Commentary: an opposing view from the Netherlands.
P2860
Q24814747-2DD3320C-A36D-41C4-A424-0DA66F39DABFQ30615398-9DCAE580-B3D8-40D6-85D8-F3AA3E81E519Q33317618-387979CA-FB15-48C5-AA7A-0663DAB9C395Q33382878-229E5D85-8CF5-449B-B00B-C950C86024B2Q33530560-469D4958-5792-4653-B87B-902F0B0AACE5Q33564447-718063A9-6174-4B14-976D-CFA2313BA4B3Q33601909-E8B4E4DF-FD97-4279-A0AB-2376DF625E63Q34029557-4B09E67B-2503-4261-8E5F-3E9014FC4AF1Q34054544-92512CED-DE6C-4FF4-B56B-E07A0F070C14Q34165915-6CB27C5B-87EB-4CF8-8BF2-6D6F38DB3C83Q34214126-DF4E6AFB-C00E-45BE-BC1E-5F3FBDDC4A2CQ34216597-C98FA7F6-18C9-4804-9BCA-BF70CBF6F50EQ34219551-AFBBB0CD-8817-46F7-812F-7A5FCAB8CF14Q34469371-AA6368E6-8A2D-402C-80DD-764CABC1264FQ34469586-A3696FB3-542F-41F1-8EBD-60E2F19D8AA5Q34469699-F3FBD1B6-6EDC-491D-9338-91595F7D3375Q34757997-E2D7FB19-E01E-4EE2-A7B8-9FD61DBD13C3Q34998308-AD1C2E02-D683-40FE-A4F4-963DC5486DD5Q34998330-C0807851-9245-4FA1-A6BE-D2BF037B2C29Q35504862-D45FB2D4-7142-4102-B717-5648A0294F56Q35761778-FAEF9099-AE08-4258-9077-752B8D70F9AAQ35842403-438C8331-C405-45A4-B34A-43BD80437E18Q35855776-B729950E-4C51-4617-8F28-44ED7BF67869Q36025813-DA91F4AE-5219-4350-9394-E0A7E370827AQ36047975-46E3A2E1-052D-4F15-893A-A5E9B61C2E68Q36185822-C6AEBBB7-5A1F-4E84-B60A-8CAC3EDED1EAQ36687941-28F5A4C8-659D-4FDE-8874-2CBCE2975331Q36824961-303D692C-2B64-4FAD-BA71-51090034B147Q36901797-88BAE6EA-75B8-4EE2-ACE3-28A4510968C1Q36936549-E4A38B18-73F8-4FD1-9028-F398F2EF8DA7Q38929858-D25AEDC5-A40A-4524-91D5-2CF1584065E6Q39629188-775EC422-8187-492C-AB84-E3D89FC07259Q40132311-19498B47-D813-4F6A-B552-83095988D9F9Q40591001-BD8E5BE0-D4B3-4CEC-8AA5-CFEBC1A5334BQ40609328-6820AE79-FE6A-4AD5-A965-01F4B7E7C55CQ46131327-A1D01272-77D2-4B54-B0B0-98D0DBA00BBE
P2860
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
description
1994 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1994年の論文
@ja
1994年論文
@yue
1994年論文
@zh-hant
1994年論文
@zh-hk
1994年論文
@zh-mo
1994年論文
@zh-tw
1994年论文
@wuu
1994年论文
@zh
1994年论文
@zh-cn
name
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@en
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@nl
type
label
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@en
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@nl
prefLabel
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@en
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations
@en
P2093
Addington-Hall J
Brenneman D
Freeling P
P2860
P304
P577
1994-07-01T00:00:00Z