P112
Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a scientific reputationFalse hopes, unwarranted fears: the trouble with medical news storiesEditors' ReplyEditors' ReplyA scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journalsThe health crisis of tuberculosis in prisons extends beyond the prison walls.Colin BlakemoreWhy drug safety should not take a back seat to efficacyCharacterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive studyDefective extraembryonic angiogenesis in mice lacking LBP-1a, a member of the grainyhead family of transcription factorsBetter reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guideOpen access: the view of the Public Library of Science.The joys and challenges of being an open-access medical journalInnovations for global health equity: beyond open access towards open data.Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.Open letter: European Medicines Agency should remove barriers to access clinical trial data.Let's be straight up about the alcohol industryOptimal evidence in difficult settings: improving health interventions and decision making in disastersThe World Health Report 2012 that wasn't.Getting more generous with the truth: clinical trial reporting in 2013 and beyond.How to stir up trouble…while riding a rollercoaster.Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial.Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement.Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative.[Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].Challenges in publication ethics.An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.On the path to global open access: a few more miles to goHow ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals.Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, April 2009.From theory to practice: translating research into health outcomes.Science must be responsible to society, not to politics.Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).Restoring the integrity of the clinical trial evidence base.Media portrayals of suicide.The impact of open access upon public health.Imatinib for chronic myeloid leukaemia: a NICE mess.UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol?Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections?The balance of risk and benefit in gene-therapy trials.
P50
Q21145322-FB075647-1665-472B-AED5-F43D81CBD986Q21563407-A0EB9ED1-A6B0-412C-9C4B-C72F223D86DCQ24810074-ED96822A-2588-4995-8474-955AB5F2500CQ24815878-B7802C51-87AC-4FFE-874E-71ABA6EE0161Q26770199-D199FDBA-BE15-4C95-9A15-B006922B7B5CQ27691397-06809EF9-C351-4AE9-B9BC-0C9E29BD26E5Q28184137-FC7CE332-B6A2-48D9-945E-EF46D9CD915EQ28477237-E7B217E8-A634-44B1-BB79-3408343526CCQ28552705-BB1C3A3A-7C0A-4C9A-9433-4D051316B57CQ28594994-0442ABC0-9897-416D-A1EE-F0A15676BDDDQ29620109-87C0DB25-7399-491E-8A04-D5E41B3BB3BFQ30483162-C1A66565-EFDE-4971-8399-1EEB1A50E560Q30484367-0C64906B-81AA-4B27-81B1-5976D5149088Q30484624-BED949BC-70F8-4BC5-8E93-D82AB7026DD7Q30491139-83E72F8A-5B55-4A15-82AA-8DE337E4F887Q30829565-08F29A57-0502-4785-ACFC-F849A5EAC48FQ33927382-320C7058-0CF6-4C53-870F-916D487BC175Q34416510-83B90C56-5A77-476F-A674-E8A74D1F7F59Q34437495-6040B26E-DFCF-43E2-9D2F-D2007FE7900AQ34574783-EE4F6415-233A-4968-892B-CEF9C4D32FB3Q35004409-0AE2A700-5956-4C55-A8C4-668557AFF55FQ36206010-0F2317B0-1E5F-486B-97FE-58C465747DD7Q40047288-D1B40F06-49E2-4F6F-8254-989C52C2AED1Q40153666-65C5DBE1-2E3F-4E09-9A5A-70F2EC18CFAEQ40942530-80010B9C-D0A5-4366-A0E5-63AA2C833C99Q41230380-5766D3A1-0955-47E2-975D-3BD99B11F623Q41990940-A4C7019C-0622-4175-9B07-CE290FACDB86Q42540094-809F8E44-AEA5-4E41-91F8-F31797853BE8Q42578630-52B99016-0B78-40F4-A1D7-43C3ECDB590DQ42906013-96051DE8-067A-4EE7-853E-A4E1BCFCDE29Q42919742-4BA4979F-479D-4197-82FD-D6B1C80CD2C2Q42931062-C062E611-28F3-4821-A558-E32FD2736F90Q42942972-477D514F-CDE8-40B6-AD08-A182CB106149Q43123055-A1591656-A29D-4DB4-B4CF-0088B8A3E306Q43161749-2C5E3CA0-18C6-42E6-8EFB-AE0569265E16Q43197671-82231F43-0AFC-4444-82FC-483B6F8CEE8FQ43797403-BBD856F7-FC56-4EB4-8916-37AD4EAFFD3CQ44893932-D6F87F94-AF31-47C5-80CC-EE20568A7F3DQ45313303-467FF124-0357-42A0-84BD-6899F6A6A2F7Q45865085-BAE95F4B-8E5B-443E-9437-4C98F083A20E
P50
description
editora collaboradora australiana
@ast
hulumtuese
@sq
redaktorino uit Australië
@nl
researcher
@en
ricercatrice
@it
taighdeoir
@ga
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Virginia Barbour
@ast
Virginia Barbour
@ca
Virginia Barbour
@da
Virginia Barbour
@de
Virginia Barbour
@en
Virginia Barbour
@es
Virginia Barbour
@fo
Virginia Barbour
@fr
Virginia Barbour
@ga
Virginia Barbour
@is
type
label
Virginia Barbour
@ast
Virginia Barbour
@ca
Virginia Barbour
@da
Virginia Barbour
@de
Virginia Barbour
@en
Virginia Barbour
@es
Virginia Barbour
@fo
Virginia Barbour
@fr
Virginia Barbour
@ga
Virginia Barbour
@is
altLabel
Barbour V
@en
Barbour
@en
Ginny Barbour
@en
V Barbour
@en
V. Barbour
@en
prefLabel
Virginia Barbour
@ast
Virginia Barbour
@ca
Virginia Barbour
@da
Virginia Barbour
@de
Virginia Barbour
@en
Virginia Barbour
@es
Virginia Barbour
@fo
Virginia Barbour
@fr
Virginia Barbour
@ga
Virginia Barbour
@is
P108
P214
P108
P1153
15833904000
P1960
yjZGsRgAAAAJ
P2002
ginnybarbour
P21
P213
0000 0001 3444 5241
P214
P27
P31
P496
0000-0002-2358-2440
P735
P7859
viaf-305743274