Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
about
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic reviewModified Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionBone Morphogenic Protein Is a Viable Adjunct for Fusion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionDoes MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Sagittal Correction.MASTERS-D Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic, Observational, Data-Monitored Trial of Minimally Invasive Fusion to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Disorders, One-Year Follow-Up.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis.Disc space preparation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of minimally invasive and open approaches.Quality-of-life outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on long-term analysis of 304 consecutive patientsMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery.A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation: A Learning Curve Analysis of a Surgeon Team's First 74 Cases.Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.Bilateral neurological deficits following unilateral minimally invasive TLIF: A review of four patientsMinimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after decompressive surgery--a finite element analysis.Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spineTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates in patients using a novel titanium implant and demineralized cancellous allograft bone spongeThe surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring - a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients.Validation and analysis of a multi-site MIS Prospective Registry through sub-analysis of an MIS TLIF SubgroupPerioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience.Clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational data-monitored study.Patient factors are associated with poor short-term outcomes after posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Open and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of intermediate results and complicationsSurgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instabilityModified minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a trans-multifidus approach: a safe and effective alternative to open-TLIF.Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital CourseA Clinical Investigation of Contralateral Neurological Symptom after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)Outcome of minimally invasive surgery in the management of tuberculous spondylitisMid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.Minimally invasive lumbopelvic instrumentation for traumatic sacrolisthesis in an elderly patient.Isolated sacral injuries: Postoperative length of stay, complications, and readmission.AxiaLIF system: minimally invasive device for presacral lumbar interbody spinal fusion.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a perspective on current evidence and clinical knowledge.Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placementMinimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
P2860
Q27014738-013AE61B-EE52-4F3C-9102-C48B0A5E2EA9Q27318188-718DDAE2-F5BA-41AF-B42E-BC0C7E83EC66Q28586420-A10F6D98-EA17-445B-A921-6EF7D37A01AFQ30252756-4BC987FB-1796-467B-B0C5-0208E794A99DQ30276383-491380DF-C833-46AD-A9FD-2CEE0491EE8EQ31115750-85CCC17F-4864-4275-A260-77509348B21BQ33592141-2E633B97-1E26-4CC7-B592-9D1BE43E891FQ33592184-03C7E995-3815-4F80-8A8C-0E5FC8A14C0FQ33592222-1C4D95FC-6B3B-4074-8A31-276E851980E9Q33718148-21FE03D0-5BF7-48FC-9930-A325CAA88B44Q33739973-349D2F67-77A7-4E39-B232-C1A6AF54C4C6Q33846241-2326BFF5-CB1F-437B-AF4C-1EF47E5972A6Q33860538-D501DF07-F7D3-41EF-9538-FC0F5A41574EQ33990188-B372AFC4-84C3-4723-AC62-2AF3D8B7FA24Q34236146-C7FBCB49-F777-420C-AA75-E2A90CC2DBA2Q34254163-1F7AC2CF-0659-4D76-A222-0524BA135BD6Q34271637-F4D3AABD-F90A-473B-9155-E6DECD77DBD1Q34729183-14F3B330-F967-4584-A47B-AEA19D5069BEQ34886122-9883948F-5DB3-4498-A543-7FA59B05AAD6Q35076087-0F31B7FD-E071-4F13-B485-F3EF36BE9083Q35076093-8ABAEA81-BC52-485E-9936-97F07F445398Q35086632-7BD4C02D-7447-48C8-A26E-710888F7D550Q35194264-7B76E26E-4726-4D02-B854-B7FEC0EB40D2Q35194280-B505C3A5-8D89-4E88-B247-2CD4BACB7A3AQ35219867-5AD62B89-43EC-4C68-8C02-6EFEF950C15FQ35334692-DED5DE25-A70B-4DE2-AD23-06FA8166728EQ35502878-E4E4780D-2954-46A7-9562-0B8AD196AFEFQ35592535-FD4DABC6-E215-44FE-9469-9FC1AF3B9BA4Q35660605-9D76B1F0-308D-4E09-A559-08283AD6E42DQ35820178-C3D2528C-2122-43B9-B61F-223E45830589Q35821502-AC6FC92D-FC1E-4E25-9CF9-BE8F75FE3E29Q35841652-2C789B50-3E72-4A11-B1A2-2006E0B21F6EQ36004405-E53619C7-99FC-4B2E-AD24-BF13708878A9Q36013174-4A022A7E-36D6-4148-A926-CFEC54E19BE2Q36069440-6E09DA48-DB5A-41A2-8363-66F59F8A766AQ36160497-F112D802-4F53-4C5D-A60C-6D1170F10139Q36167447-ECE98DFA-5DF0-4D52-905D-9CA23D522810Q36335843-B8FD98D3-12CE-4B60-95B1-752DF7933835Q36347078-0B6A0213-BE66-4F47-BDCF-A00BB3BAF66EQ36347117-ED1AD0C2-48F2-478E-B07D-992FDD5CCC11
P2860
Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
2009年论文
@zh
2009年论文
@zh-cn
name
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
type
label
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
prefLabel
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Clinical and radiological outc ...... minal lumbar interbody fusion.
@en
P2093
Chan Wearn Benedict Peng
Seang Beng Tan
Seng Yew Poh
Wai Mun Yue
William Yeo
P304
P356
10.1097/BRS.0B013E3181A4E3BE
P407
P577
2009-06-01T00:00:00Z