Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
about
Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literatureVideo-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: keynote lectureEvidence-Based Operative Details in Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Surgical Approach, Lymphadenectomy, AnastomosisMinimally Invasive Techniques and Hybrid Operations for Esophageal CancerSurgical Therapy of Early Carcinoma of the EsophagusLaparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directionsEsophageal surgery in minimally invasive eraIs minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysisRecent developments in esophageal adenocarcinomaIs hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysisSurgical indications and optimization of patients for resectable esophageal malignanciesStrategies to reduce pulmonary complications after esophagectomyThe epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Barrett's carcinomaEndoscopic Closure for Full-Thickness Gastrointestinal Defects: Available Applications and Emerging InnovationsMinimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysisThree-field lymph node dissection in treating the esophageal cancerComparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysisCurrent Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer TreatmentCurrent Advancement in Multidisciplinary Treatment for Resectable cStage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Japan.Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study.Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy.Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter studyCurrent Trend of Robotic Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeries in Korea: Analysis of Seven-Year National Data.'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic ReviewPreoperative inspiratory muscle training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing esophageal resection (PREPARE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Current management of esophageal cancerAttaining Proficiency in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy While Maximizing Safety During Procedure Development.Study protocol for the nutritional route in oesophageal resection trial: a single-arm feasibility trial (NUTRIENT trial)Endoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis with luminal apposition Axios stent (LAS) approach: a new concept for hybrid "Lewis Santy".Morbidity analysis in minimally invasive esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer versus conventional over the last 10 years, a single institution experience.CMISG1701: a multicenter prospective randomized phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamouThe feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Modern impact of video assisted thoracic surgery.The relevance of the Siewert classification in the era of multimodal therapy for adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction.Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies.Robotic assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient.Indication for 'Over the scope' (OTS)-clip vs. covered self-expanding metal stent (cSEMS) is unequal in upper gastrointestinal leakage: results from a retrospective head-to-head comparisonThe effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
P2860
Q26746249-8902E4BE-5B57-4942-A6F6-C3BBF0353A80Q26748838-EAEB0195-D0F1-41CF-9E8C-1B56095A951DQ26753866-6EC7468E-8896-48CD-8037-635B967F225AQ26753867-B9BDBF72-EEE5-448B-8675-59FD00B94648Q26753868-3F817FB8-6443-471E-8009-D96DC4E9EC27Q26766111-764C2FD9-BF66-4EA8-ACE0-A128FEAE6778Q26769068-DB2417A9-53BF-4C35-8C2A-6B88184F56DBQ26785698-AD107866-766C-442C-ABA8-998B26D13774Q26849652-5B6E35D1-35DD-41C8-8422-7564C69401F6Q26860383-1BD1ED34-311A-40FD-9F3B-C5B99FB56140Q26861000-F648354D-5405-4525-8FC0-926D21E3FA5BQ27009088-FFB62AFD-E514-4558-B9FE-1EC1171BE5BEQ27027149-622B2C46-FBF7-4E52-99E3-945B8B020A33Q28075336-36CC0291-5383-41DD-B631-2BECE6279860Q28076361-7723A47E-1E7A-43B0-BDBD-96430FB81B45Q28077519-35A75045-0B38-4328-930B-29763F18FDA5Q28084114-17F0F08F-E4DE-48D1-AB88-430F4C69C462Q30240008-7D45D3EC-D3C5-4C56-8140-437823FD0C61Q30244382-866C97DC-DDC1-4B35-AC3B-65F3BD68A31EQ30252079-2644C9DF-9BCB-47C8-A205-A8C573457FF2Q30825480-3D7F2191-355E-4B69-89C8-F860138737DDQ30832813-47B13B07-126B-4FD6-A4C7-871ABC83FF5EQ30891555-25DD7EEC-F2D0-421F-BFC8-43BA5BEE4EA0Q31012270-C6679A94-CBD9-45C6-A610-A147543CFB23Q31125157-C543452D-635D-43C8-BFE6-9F40D2B18460Q33604658-BEB1415F-55DB-4BAA-ACE2-8B419011E208Q33658207-611D86C3-787D-4670-A3C9-5483A1CF7015Q33668274-59FDD151-DCBE-484E-AEFE-D34EE1B556CEQ33744874-23E6E390-21A2-4846-91DD-4A834F224061Q33746561-B3C501E2-6A8D-4100-9B03-FA2A7AB5C58FQ33837985-71CB52EA-3B36-45FD-AF1D-C17FBB381A1DQ33850915-E393CE2B-E472-4563-986F-EF33F09967ECQ33854596-AD046DE3-F487-488B-84CA-43ED35E4A740Q34374229-AE704DD0-E75D-4950-8075-1E8097EB2A53Q34457907-84488345-BE5F-4DE9-904B-182A039BF740Q34678579-C6AD6D78-F6FA-4B13-A554-A77712C06938Q34821244-6B89D184-3EF3-4CD7-A903-3056225E6113Q34962022-E1D406E5-1B8F-41C9-9D63-517025FD3233Q35023904-5D2CBD68-5854-496A-AA25-3524147ECA51Q35171818-99C94C4C-D17B-445B-85DB-73D4FDBD70E9
P2860
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Minimally invasive versus open ...... , randomised controlled trial.
@en
type
label
Minimally invasive versus open ...... , randomised controlled trial.
@en
prefLabel
Minimally invasive versus open ...... , randomised controlled trial.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Minimally invasive versus open ...... , randomised controlled trial.
@en
P2093
Camiel Rosman
Donald L van der Peet
Elly S M de Lange
H Jaap Bonjer
Jean H G Klinkenbijl
Josep Roig Garcia
Kirsten W Maas
Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Markus W Hollmann
Miguel A Cuesta
P304
P356
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9
P407
P577
2012-05-01T00:00:00Z