Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
about
On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature reviewLumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessmentComplex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulcerationNon-pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritisNon-pharmacological interventions for improving work participation in patients with inflammatory arthritisAntibiotics for preventing infection in people receiving chest drainsBotulinum toxin injection for tennis elbowComplex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulcerationComplex interventions for preventing diabetic foot ulcerationBiodegradable collagen matrix implant vs mitomycin-C as an adjuvant in trabeculectomy: a 24-month, randomized clinical trialEndoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classificationMetabolic and structural changes in lower-limb skeletal muscle following neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a systematic reviewValidation of orthopedic postoperative pain assessment methods for dogs: a prospective, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled studyEndoscopic versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Palliation of Advanced Malignant Hilar Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic ReviewShort- and medium-term reproducibility of gastric emptying of a solid meal determined by a low dose of 13C-octanoic acid and nondispersive isotope-selective infrared spectrometryOnline questionnaire development: using film to engage participants and then gather attitudes towards the sharing of genomic dataGerman version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): translation and validationEfficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic reviewVerification of accurate technical insight: a prerequisite for self-directed surgical training.Reliability of preoperative evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian tumorsThe contribution of bone and cartilage to the near-infrared spectrum of osteochondral tissueInvestigating the performance and cost-effectiveness of the simple ultrasound-based rules compared to the risk of malignancy index in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (SUBSONiC-study): protocol of a prospective multicenter cohort study in the NetherlSequential cranial ultrasound and cerebellar diffusion weighted imaging contribute to the early prognosis of neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants.Left atrial mechanical functions in chronic primary mitral regurgitation patients: a velocity vector imaging-based studyValidation of a grading system for lateral nasal wall insufficiencySystematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community.Reference ranges for the linear dimensions of the intracranial ventricles in preterm neonates.Development and validation of a questionnaire for analyzing real-life falls in long-term care captured on video.How good are we at assessing driving visual fields in diabetics?Automatic Classification on Multi-Modal MRI Data for Diagnosis of the Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty Subtype of Parkinson's Disease.Can local staff reliably assess their own programs? A confirmatory test-retest study of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling data collectors in UgandaOptical coherence tomography-enhanced microlaryngoscopy: preliminary report of a noncontact optical coherence tomography system integrated with a surgical microscope.Inter-rater reliability of historical data collected by non-medical research assistants and physicians in patients with acute abdominal pain.The GALS locomotor screen and disabilityVitamin and mineral status in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori in reflux oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus.Role of endoscopic esophageal dilation in managing eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Assessing psychiatric disorder with a human interviewer or a computer.Emergency admission of patients to general surgical beds: attitudes of general practitioners, surgical trainees, and consultants in Liverpool, UKReliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments.
P2860
Q21203706-5A17F622-C31C-43E1-9D07-00F075AD3341Q21257156-E68CD671-6CAC-4561-B0EE-30A7117D9134Q24187773-7E6D5AC8-F96C-4A7C-A23E-662706D613CAQ24188097-80DEC2C8-7E6C-4364-B81F-D28DCF6511B6Q24197632-8EAF67BB-C4A3-4026-A484-9FFF5A0E58AEQ24234028-6A06606C-F61B-4C3E-AE1D-C5A264849FEEQ24235219-12822283-690F-4924-8C9B-86A36305FA7CQ24241070-AD748C7B-D5BE-40F3-8933-AA5523D50EE4Q24242652-BC4868CE-DE31-41B7-BFD4-1CD8FC4372F4Q24630369-F83AC3B5-1544-4C81-A2B5-FF5068F64423Q24670182-465B4B38-55F3-4ED8-82BD-EBBDD1F9D21CQ26999324-576A6664-24B0-4E53-ACB9-DAC27F675BEEQ27335719-23FAD7CF-89CD-4F7C-8783-2DEB56319BC3Q28075370-C295353C-77D5-42EE-9ADE-A5A1F9B29226Q28654813-70D10A44-1930-4F3D-9A37-6A3D74362D25Q28660579-3B47DBDE-659C-487B-AE6B-255C563F23B4Q28917047-E9A004C0-0807-40DB-B2CC-E7EA2984BB8AQ30249062-CA42EBA1-A4FF-47C1-A6F5-3EF8C94A7B6FQ30360380-BAF085F3-DED3-46D6-B285-FEFBB61F9481Q30361167-55DC8F6D-9E1C-4E4A-B8C5-AFFB20D804BBQ30401702-B17ACF84-A087-4585-8333-83949B740B24Q30407535-37ECB309-9569-428B-BE53-8C0BCBF89A2FQ30427702-35DC495F-8B9C-410C-B666-623D5614EDF9Q30433403-873E4008-26BC-4C14-B221-BBA63C4F17B1Q30448356-1303D487-91B3-4581-B11C-96ABC29D0CA3Q30494973-3606BA36-AAFD-40FF-8FDB-D447C357F09CQ30495130-EBCA2AD8-1FF0-43C4-BEE3-36A2279B1E5AQ30539811-C251A0CD-E589-4D7D-B88E-E6B7C7E167F5Q30631640-3789EFEB-A539-4446-AE9D-A28DC1EE958CQ31095916-EAC23C84-762D-48DB-9D34-F1A968FB5379Q31122106-1FED5223-EB3E-4102-BA85-4571F62A2B79Q33359824-F835BD28-34E3-4C5D-8699-4B40B48853E2Q33475603-E6B888A7-CEA8-4881-A041-0525570643E2Q33565999-B4076FC5-8C3E-400F-B036-1B64115EB09DQ33615646-5FEFBE7F-DF12-4868-A5AD-21A116322E95Q33617647-5DB9EF01-E5F8-462A-93AA-30007B79D1C5Q33621176-9C1C0796-99EC-4F38-8471-8EA29A067655Q33702368-4807C40F-4BA5-446C-9C1D-3B5765D7AFAEQ33704376-1D6A33A4-EE8F-46CC-803C-25E86FC1683FQ33729400-C1449238-FFA5-4E2B-855D-6F685C4B6BC5
P2860
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
description
1992 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1992年の論文
@ja
1992年論文
@yue
1992年論文
@zh-hant
1992年論文
@zh-hk
1992年論文
@zh-mo
1992年論文
@zh-tw
1992年论文
@wuu
1992年论文
@zh
1992年论文
@zh-cn
name
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@en
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@nl
type
label
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@en
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@nl
prefLabel
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@en
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.304.6840.1491
P407
P577
1992-06-01T00:00:00Z