Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards.
about
Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis.Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal AcceptanceEscherichia coli O157:H7--Discerning Facts from Fiction: An Integrated Research and Extension Project for Multiple Audiences.Consumers' Risk Perception of Household Cleaning and Washing Products.Including growers in the “food safety” conversation: enhancing the design and implementation of food safety programming based on farm and marketing needs of fresh fruit and vegetable producers
P2860
Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@en
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@nl
type
label
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@en
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@nl
prefLabel
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@en
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... valuating food safety hazards.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Risk ranking: investigating ex ...... evaluating food safety hazards
@en
P2093
Cindy Jardine
Kevin Webster
Sean B Cash
P2860
P304
P356
10.4315/0362-028X-73.10.1875
P577
2010-10-01T00:00:00Z