Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses.
about
Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?The effects of physical therapeutic agents on serum levels of stress hormones in patients with osteoarthritisEffect of tendon vibration during wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the decline and recovery of muscle force.Time course of central and peripheral alterations after isometric neuromuscular electrical stimulation-induced muscle damage.Acute effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on myokines and markers of muscle damage.Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.Acute metabolic, hormonal, and psychological responses to strength training with superimposed EMS at the beginning and the end of a 6 week training period.Efficiency of neuromuscular electrical stimulation: A comparison of elicited force and subject tolerance using three electrical waveforms.Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.Protection against muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation: efficiency of a preconditioning programme.Comparison of the effects of kilohertz- and low-frequency electric stimulations: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysisComparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women
P2860
Q28247768-1DD260C9-21EF-46B9-BB29-CA77C63B8A93Q30374704-82846FB5-64EC-4610-8C95-ABA497E07485Q33630390-B5F1607E-1C98-4F83-8AC1-E3D216BDF487Q35249806-6402385D-8B94-4426-B649-1CB84029C031Q37441256-D9128975-C3A0-4011-A8F5-66D873BA22AEQ37910793-A5D6273D-2F23-4A64-AC92-C6B17EE6AFE2Q38607312-0E2E8AA6-00A4-473C-95DC-C003154EE1EBQ42076441-4869EBD6-FFA5-45B1-8B7B-F382BED3FD90Q42096401-8D2978A4-266C-4603-A47E-8EB68EA13B16Q47198966-0E3690EC-16F3-47CB-A05F-31DF6D6466C7Q47955899-59A4ED24-8A88-4D68-9AF6-36FFB2E3BAE2Q54356656-8D52159C-EE5A-4144-849C-4933FB88BF37Q55037079-29C4F647-564A-460C-A7D6-FFE01746D3B0Q56639031-2C3FCBEE-4CEB-4165-A71E-611FFBD44A2BQ56639035-EC1772FA-5AAF-4A9C-9A86-40AAC407B8B1
P2860
Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@en
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@nl
type
label
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@en
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@en
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Comparison between alternating ...... and systemic acute responses.
@en
P2093
Abdulaziz Aldayel
Marc Jubeau
P2860
P304
P356
10.1152/JAPPLPHYSIOL.00189.2010
P407
P577
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z