about
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritisIs the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidenceA combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit dataEvaluation of routinely reported surgical site infections against microbiological culture results: a tool to identify patient groups where diagnosis and treatment may be improved.The Quality of Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands: Data From the Dutch Lung Surgery Audit.Clinical Staging of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands-Need for Improvement in an Era With Expanding Nonsurgical Treatment Options: Data From the Dutch Lung Surgery Audit.Variation in Prosthetic Joint Infection and treatment strategies during 4.5 years of follow-up after primary joint arthroplasty using administrative data of 41397 patients across Australian, European and United States hospitalsDe-implementation of expensive blood saving measures in hip and knee arthroplasties: study protocol for the LISBOA-II cluster randomized trial.The effectiveness of a de-implementation strategy to reduce low-value blood management techniques in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trialFollow up after a family based genetic screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia: is screening alone enough?Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of routine clinical care.Frequent use of blood-saving measures in elective orthopaedic surgery: a 2012 Dutch blood management survey.Most important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patientsSmoking and the compression of morbidity.Effectiveness of routine reporting to identify minor and serious adverse outcomes in surgical patients.Barriers and Facilitators Associated with Non-Surgical Treatment Use for Osteoarthritis Patients in Orthopaedic PracticePreoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Variation in use of non-surgical treatments among osteoarthritis patients in orthopaedic practice in the NetherlandsIndication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview.Designing a strategy to implement cost-effective blood transfusion management in elective hip and knee arthroplasties: a study protocol.Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC studySurgical adverse outcomes and patients' evaluation of quality of care: inherent risk or reduced quality of care?Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative studyDesigning a strategy to implement optimal conservative treatments in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis in orthopedic practice: a study protocol of the BART-OP study.Effects of donor-, pancreas-, and isolation-related variables on human islet isolation outcome: a systematic review.Meta-analysis of the central line bundle for preventing catheter-related infections: a case study in appraising the evidence in quality improvement.Hospital variation in allogeneic transfusion and extended length of stay in primary elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional studyImplementation and de-implementation: two sides of the same coin?Erythropoietin to reduce allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty.Contemporary Insertion of Central Venous Access Catheters in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Record Review Study of 538 Catheters in a Single Center.Involving patients in a multidisciplinary European consensus process and in the development of a 'patient summary of the consensus document for colon and rectal cancer care'.Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients.The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment.Importance of patient reported outcome measures versus clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients evaluation on quality of care.Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care.Nonelective colon cancer resections in elderly patients: results from the dutch surgical colorectal audit.Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals.Response to "Patient organisations should also establish databanks on medical complications".Correction. Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.
P50
Q24188210-DDF3D8C0-2586-43F4-B3A3-F2398094C7A9Q26829311-D3D0FB67-ADDB-48BD-B022-EE411A894AEAQ30761794-130A2A17-9A06-4420-A4B7-5DCC61F26A6DQ30878125-529915CA-600B-4CC4-A48C-47F48C55F245Q31132938-AB877F7A-2379-4C74-A084-DF6AD2D30B59Q31132941-0295E683-0F14-46D9-945F-57E2A6568FA9Q33717496-62330239-B36C-49D4-BBE6-9CE8F50BB5C6Q33726397-2041D47D-0558-404E-A22E-35179033F6F7Q33742427-5F0A86D4-15CC-4D25-BBCD-4D51362F4783Q33856748-A79FF5E6-9299-40BE-B360-9BCEE997090FQ34015250-14C39AAD-2301-4789-8036-DDC2B69B354AQ34410112-6343A4AF-8AB6-4A73-8399-0F27BCA88BEFQ34894968-E485D871-A2AD-4571-B432-7E1C0C295A3AQ35141978-BE4BA1D2-9309-4379-A9FB-1F9D008D1D76Q35402724-538D55E7-72EA-4E7A-8F98-9A3AE61684B5Q35528019-1A6FDA83-AAD1-4AC3-BC97-E70449DAB9B6Q35901582-FA607D9B-DB3D-47A3-9E52-F828E24704A2Q36019122-CCD979B5-127F-4768-8207-4B1BC8CD0558Q36053685-657C451F-C814-4A84-AD5D-BE36A6FE5487Q36187960-6C6776B6-B986-4B58-9F85-26AFE38964F9Q36236004-8DF63865-7C28-423D-B8B3-39FD9E39D205Q36300278-55509381-687D-49C7-A7DA-254E7FACBC2FQ37121834-868279A7-47EB-44AA-9C5D-823A3C461BEEQ37153417-C30292DE-9E7C-483F-9A56-69A9D6D209F7Q37596790-C18AF13E-19FB-415D-A6DF-12CEED891AB9Q38103329-C7153A25-5E89-44A8-8C15-38DE89CAF315Q38548850-E4A55FB3-3FAF-40F7-B52F-7CEF98367FECQ38669254-E011F3D2-51B5-4AE9-86E4-E04C81FC7BA9Q38832475-6AABA4EF-6634-47E7-95F3-5CABF92EFEFEQ38868207-77FDCF03-D5DB-4B78-BD4E-CD83DA6FAFA3Q38980498-8B520541-B603-416D-9E12-0BC27C8BAE63Q39186394-4282650D-EDEF-420F-B8FD-AA71920004ACQ39623028-50ACA2D5-33C4-4D65-B2B6-51B911A192ECQ39689126-03D56D89-B517-46C0-A453-B6B0ADCD5974Q39879415-0681B915-900B-40C1-9295-0C07979316E0Q39905591-C6CC6613-BDEA-4D8E-9042-FA917381B1CFQ41972322-C1C46DFC-69D8-43A9-A411-0BED24D26EADQ42655619-B58A6D2E-5B7D-4661-A919-A58CB3CF0DD2Q43076921-40CFE2F6-DE77-47EA-9A84-FC8AE2794F8AQ43167205-DFE3C37D-2D6D-4CE6-B277-ADF6BF0C67D2
P50
description
hulumtuese
@sq
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@ast
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@en
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@es
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@nl
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@sl
type
label
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@ast
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@en
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@es
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@nl
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@sl
altLabel
Perla van de Mheen
@en
prefLabel
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@ast
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@en
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@es
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@nl
Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
@sl
P1053
I-2783-2015
P106
P21
P31
P3829
P496
0000-0003-1439-0989