Biomechanical comparison of four soft tissue replacement materials: an in vitro evaluation of single and multilaminate porcine small intestinal submucosa, canine fascia lata, and polypropylene mesh.
about
Confocal laser scanning microscopy evaluation of an acellular dermis tissue transplant (Epiflex®)Nanostructured polyurethane-poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid scaffolds increase bladder tissue regeneration: an in vivo studyTreatment of corneal ulcers: when is surgery indicated?In vivo biomechanical properties of heavy versus light weight monofilament polypropylene meshes. Does the knitting pattern matter?Biomechanical comparison of canine fascia lata and thoracolumbar fascia: an in vitro evaluation of replacement tissues for body wall reconstruction.
P2860
Biomechanical comparison of four soft tissue replacement materials: an in vitro evaluation of single and multilaminate porcine small intestinal submucosa, canine fascia lata, and polypropylene mesh.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@en
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@nl
type
label
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@en
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@nl
prefLabel
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@en
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Biomechanical comparison of fo ...... lata, and polypropylene mesh.
@en
P2093
Gregory A Arnold
Kyle G Mathews
Peter Mente
Tim Seaboch
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1532-950X.2009.00577.X
P577
2009-10-01T00:00:00Z