Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.
about
Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.EPS Mid-Career Award 2014. The control of attention in visual search: Cognitive and neural mechanisms.From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures.Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates.Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.Scopolamine Reduces Electrophysiological Indices of Distractor Suppression: Evidence from a Contingent Capture Task.Contingent orienting or contingent capture: a size singleton matching the target-distractor size relation cannot capture attention.The different roles of category- and feature-specific attentional control settings on attentional enhancement and inhibition.Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture.Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.Emergence of the benefits and costs of grouping for visual search.
P2860
Q34631036-9FFEADF1-BC6D-4633-90B6-FD4834C26894Q38377679-D2557596-7AC2-45F9-9411-115CE4CDB131Q38537621-AAABCDD9-9EB7-4F28-AD3F-49826609284AQ41960251-EF984CE0-592D-4B06-B52C-2924D10C8A35Q44492120-0A774AA5-EF1E-484E-8AF6-4F97F6C605B5Q44938268-24DE36E9-DC65-4D67-96BF-CF97B161C094Q46910522-414169CF-A893-48C3-A746-EC1597366231Q47139707-3A6CB5EE-9224-4C55-811F-DD76C9928413Q47193528-8CDDCA51-BD23-4529-AF28-9730E3110958Q47674881-DC8B9FBA-7D15-4B41-9FE6-87A2357E8BCAQ48320273-0A29E8DA-91DC-415C-9C66-C4DB1AA30CCEQ48550739-060CEDC0-1A21-4C3E-A700-737795C15575Q48649225-AB6804AC-1FC6-4E62-95DD-6764F2EFD60AQ48825745-9FBAB18A-AE26-4080-B1D0-74787769E0B1Q50213636-86E028BB-45E9-499F-A5C3-9BBEE9597CC2Q51737013-D31C950D-F9E1-4217-B586-CEC6509354E1Q52583907-FAF10B5B-AE26-44A5-9BC3-3D5E75672DA8
P2860
Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@en
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@nl
type
label
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@en
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@nl
prefLabel
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@en
Top-down task sets for combine ...... attentional object selection.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Top-down task sets for combine ...... n attentional object selection
@en
P2093
Monika Kiss
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.3758/S13414-012-0391-Z
P577
2013-02-01T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1004966336