International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?
about
Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammogramsTime trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.Should breast cancer survivors be excluded from, or invited to, organised mammography screening programmes?Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool.A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening.False positive mammograms in Europe: do they affect reattendance?Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening.Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and DenmarkInter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammogramsEvaluating Population-Based Screening Mammography Programs Internationally.Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway.Determinants of the number of mammography units in 31 countries with significant mammography screening.Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.Cumulative risk of false positive test in relation to breast symptoms in mammography screening: a historical prospective cohort study.Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.Recommendations for breast imaging follow-up of women with a previous history of breast cancer: position paper from the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa) and the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by SIRM.Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes.An investigation into the mammographic appearances of missed breast cancers when recall rates are reduced.Experiences with a self-test for Dutch breast screening radiologists: lessons learnt.Tumour doubling times and the length bias in breast cancer screening programmes.FDG-PET/CT detection of very early breast cancer in women with breast microcalcification lesions found in mammography screening.The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation.Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.Comparison of cumulative false-positive risk of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.Comparing interval breast cancer rates in Norway and North Carolina: results and challenges.Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screeningAssociation between Screening Mammography Recall Rate and Interval Cancers in the UK Breast Cancer Service Screening Program: A Cohort Study
P2860
Q33330999-9418052F-229E-499D-B89B-C78F449B9F6BQ33964312-28537AC5-10A2-4A33-97F3-5FC721F7BC1FQ34039562-95BD8F48-4720-4F9D-8CE5-70CD7831D710Q34044186-097D85BA-58CB-4C43-81A1-7A0A1AA17EF9Q34194755-AFC5C431-BDB9-41C1-A785-4E715542B4C4Q35178456-E57D651F-0FD0-411C-AD50-240DC9FDAE70Q35178485-3C0B33B4-9A3F-4876-916F-504992431E4AQ35747289-B315D939-1379-420C-A3C5-A0F73D969407Q35957551-36A09B0C-13BB-4B32-8755-093B88C64DABQ36407013-D125DDE9-5B75-4798-B4F1-03344B1DC505Q36666702-EB9AAB0C-724D-4951-9AA8-DBCF93E9A271Q36727156-69C475E5-96A7-4E69-A399-C9FB320B7558Q36935979-A82C9398-1378-45A3-87EE-A45304B39385Q36994862-1A958139-048C-4264-8A95-6D496F17F796Q37233803-EE16BB65-C9D8-498E-9F46-94356263EA64Q37288821-1D1B73DB-D7BA-4D2E-BE4D-DDC062C05397Q37405120-0500BAAE-2B84-4F07-8C21-C0D11BA12A54Q37967148-71B6E986-3374-443E-8F3B-6FD08660A37AQ38042899-F7EF1222-2C9E-4F82-A5F3-F8D4AEFF386FQ38722635-04A0FE6B-7DDE-4877-8F40-BEB7360C2099Q39346378-EB98F39B-A4F1-440A-B39A-CE8E31751592Q39755212-6B6155F0-8056-4823-AFD7-882950D74F3FQ41075658-DB383F93-3D23-4B20-B137-5B490A683190Q42614828-1C39842C-CB82-4439-9164-1250053A89BDQ45328273-C1D9DF45-8695-448F-B604-47144FDF6166Q46219002-13C88F0B-0CA0-4C3C-AC69-E11EB0CEEF18Q50567337-8D7333E0-6A44-409F-8A6E-FA08835B3DD6Q51137343-E03CB1D8-8BA5-4F76-9F4A-84678635A0A7Q55260831-BCA77011-615E-4312-AECA-206EFDAE997AQ57213799-12AA436E-4EF7-40DC-83A2-1D268C1A3783Q58918864-FA581773-4110-45D9-8E15-EA1214A4F966
P2860
International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@en
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@nl
type
label
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@en
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@nl
prefLabel
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@en
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
International comparison of pe ...... g mammography: can it be done?
@en
P2093
B C Yankaskas
C N Klabunde
International Breast Cancer Screening Network
J Fracheboud
R Ancelle-Park
P304
P356
10.1258/0969141042467430
P577
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z