Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

about

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q43874424

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年学术文章

@wuu

2013年学术文章

@zh

2013年学术文章

@zh-cn

2013年学术文章

@zh-hans

2013年学术文章

@zh-my

2013年学术文章

@zh-sg

2013年學術文章

@yue

2013年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@en

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@nl

type

Item

label

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@en

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@nl

prefLabel

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@en

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@nl

P1476

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update—part I: clinical efficacy.

@en

P2093

Edward J Swift

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael J Wahl

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial

The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors.

Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.

12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.

Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.

In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.

15-year evaluation of Class II amalgam restorations.

P304

360-364

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/JERD.12051

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-08-09T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

24148987

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string