Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
about
The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour InductionVaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China.Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
P2860
Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年学术文章
@wuu
2014年学术文章
@zh
2014年学术文章
@zh-cn
2014年学术文章
@zh-hans
2014年学术文章
@zh-my
2014年学术文章
@zh-sg
2014年學術文章
@yue
2014年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@en
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@nl
type
label
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@en
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@nl
prefLabel
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@en
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Double-balloon catheter vs. di ...... or with an unfavorable cervix.
@en
P2093
Chuying Du
Jianping Tan
Yinglin Liu
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00404-014-3547-3
P577
2014-11-19T00:00:00Z