Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q43901559

about

An integrated widefield imaging and spectroscopy system for contrast-enhanced, image-guided resection of tumors.Postoperative systems models more accurately predict risk of significant disease progression than standard risk groups and a 10-year postoperative nomogram: potential impact on the receipt of adjuvant therapy after surgery.Hand-held spectroscopic device for in vivo and intraoperative tumor detection: contrast enhancement, detection sensitivity, and tissue penetration.Adjuvant medical therapy for prostate cancer.Salvage radiotherapy for patients with PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy: issues and challenges.Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis Tracking the origins and drivers of subclonal metastatic expansion in prostate cancer.The need for, and utilization of prostate-bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in British Columbia.Toward microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography for intraoperative surgical margin assessment.The impact of body mass index on treatment outcomes for patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer Quantitative, spectrally-resolved intraoperative fluorescence imaging.Two different perspectives in the management of pT3 and/or margin-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.Image-guided tumor surgery: will there be a role for fluorescent nanoparticles?Zero positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: is the end in sight.Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).Impact of positive surgical margins on oncological outcome following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): long-term results.The Prostate Cancer Registry: monitoring patterns and quality of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer.Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization.Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.Emerging technology: applications of Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer.Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.Contemporary radical prostatectomy Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of gastrin releasing peptide receptor targeting in prostate cancer lymph node metastases.Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.Prostate Cancer Detection Using Composite Impedance Metric.Elevated Jagged-1 and Notch-1 expression in high grade and metastatic prostate cancers.Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.Biochemical recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy at a single institution.Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience.

P2860

Q30650940-C2E09DE8-83FE-4A2A-B210-F52F2C216918 Q33669456-E1408322-6921-4E8F-A1F1-AF0157C6B10B Q33711448-217819E3-1C69-4FCB-8290-B4EF7D2F6E0A Q33758771-B73FCCBB-5EA4-46D9-8010-63199372E4D5 Q33766462-91A6D58D-F65E-4375-89F1-F24835CDC8FC Q33990394-3C05A9F1-3DBE-401D-9751-9751C7F6F1AF Q35231112-900483FA-A157-4C77-B959-0B1EA78274DC Q35360084-5363FF9E-F2F3-4D27-B0E5-1463BE5BCE72 Q35407284-EBC926CA-3300-48FC-B6E4-798AF6A43887 Q35894629-C62646D8-39E3-4646-B5D9-AB715A599851 Q36016917-E219C2FE-74B1-4C66-A333-B75C6A791F81 Q36090379-E6A953C8-E353-4438-B2FC-365748C31A5F Q36397667-D902EBBF-E59C-42E0-A1F8-904B2CDF7086 Q36595228-FF4DA44D-894C-4641-BAFC-5E4870E84A43 Q36994932-3B3463A2-228D-47CA-B7CE-EB929D8AF680 Q37353992-1F6CE0BE-1240-4B9B-92B2-AB04A26B3D0F Q37421927-F1881425-6304-4839-9138-122358C0E6F4 Q37579088-01C53F11-7761-4F86-9519-E2F6F75C036B Q38009239-6F95D1A7-B7A1-4147-8BC0-344F9E805CD4 Q38056990-3333AB48-F1E8-4906-8D9E-76A5550A0A17 Q38089328-71372849-2A95-4FE1-B1E6-A3508B4B8FAD Q38151295-6F9F4CF0-46B3-42D7-8BED-A164F75D7C14 Q38165283-6DD9128F-C500-49E9-B978-94D60BBCB215 Q38186589-778F6F2C-21FF-4913-BE3E-A2A1575C4305 Q38266018-889748EC-8DD4-4A12-8B81-6EB426CE556E Q38750075-259F684D-2F3D-44ED-9A2A-65B25BFCCEF3 Q38807747-97D57EEA-A950-4183-BC63-00AF91B0512E Q38807889-11943FA4-B2AD-4BFB-9314-5BE2C2F575C1 Q39218047-CC838D42-9FF5-4048-AC85-CBA83F56886A Q39326545-6E7EF676-2457-49E1-B98E-4EA8049A0C02 Q39681476-82C78476-ECCD-4630-82CC-D2AA9B0AE602 Q40029207-3D182734-F107-456F-9015-9FD8F7CC4AE4 Q40561955-A5AF3023-061E-415B-817B-F5B3FF2D1A92 Q40574917-9984F69B-F8CC-4F13-AD1D-EEA64CC0FE2A Q40586543-0E9F9427-5F76-40EB-BBA1-33B844AB5BF2 Q40619712-036D5643-0F8E-48E1-B57C-B793C5A59AB7 Q41119989-E102BEDC-CC2C-4554-B2EB-6D0DE36F0705 Q41650145-6F37E149-F3EA-47B4-9A70-8BE81ECF1144 Q41718014-2BCD7273-E795-4E4B-A021-E61E40E7CF7C Q41948669-70CB205A-312F-450F-937C-494567BF49C8

P2860

Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q43901559

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年学术文章

@wuu

2005年学术文章

@zh

2005年学术文章

@zh-cn

2005年学术文章

@zh-hans

2005年学术文章

@zh-my

2005年学术文章

@zh-sg

2005年學術文章

@yue

2005年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@en

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@nl

type

label

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@en

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@nl

prefLabel

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@en

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@nl

P1433

Q43901559-31288BB8-CE94-4978-958B-78D20FBE7AE3

P1476

Q43901559-FC2C1080-8749-4779-9AA6-F5E136690378

P2093

Q43901559-0B04DB09-A701-4ED5-BE50-7F5F28109511

Q43901559-25A72F5D-22B7-4030-88B3-1866442B9C74

Q43901559-25DC004F-86B4-41B3-AB77-BE4DC6707AA2

Q43901559-4DC4CBF6-CEBE-4E65-B259-B9623F1BAB33

Q43901559-5413BCF6-4478-4BBC-8D66-79A226BB4445

Q43901559-692F5F81-4A2A-45D0-A524-0CE0265FB449

Q43901559-804071E2-4957-4E4F-9BF5-36E0E75D4FCD

Q43901559-825FBA56-1893-4972-BB9F-1F9A03D618B9

Q43901559-8559B78A-07A4-4011-9FC2-F0DD7C900141

Q43901559-B3A26F9C-0B2C-4E31-93FF-20DC1C96CB96

P304

Q43901559-D2299F73-7272-4A09-A0AB-9B85E687FAA6

P31

Q43901559-ECD749B8-4278-4917-B908-2015BFE039D0

P356

Q43901559-0427993B-BAA4-422D-8F72-B9093CBE282D

P407

Q43901559-F35BEBD5-B03A-44DC-8F8D-67BE7FEB7AAF

P433

Q43901559-B64E09CD-E83F-406D-8ECD-03AAED0B37B6

P478

Q43901559-20B8ACEC-4C28-4FA9-9311-0A46E9E91187

P577

Q43901559-7FD52780-9088-4F39-9E05-6A59E797BC84

P698

Q43901559-6D110C7C-7BA0-429B-83B1-049DA35DDA28

P356

J.UROLOGY.2005.06.108

P1433

P1476

Prognostic impact of positive ...... l assessment of 5831 patients.

@en

P2093

Eric Klein

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fritz H Schröder

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ilias Cagiannos

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

James A Eastham

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Markus Graefen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael W Kattan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peter T Scardino

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Phillip D Stricker

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Pierre I Karakiewicz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas Cangiano

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P304

1245-1250

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2005.06.108

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

66

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

16360451

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string