Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial.

Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q43939368

about

Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly Early rehabilitation programs after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: evidence and criticism Safety of fast-track rehabilitation after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis Network meta-analysis of protocol-driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Is Feasible and Achieves Similar Results as in Younger Patients An overview and methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery.Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis.Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience.Fast-track program vs traditional care in surgery for gastric cancer.Optimizing senior's surgical care - Elder-friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment (EASE) study: rationale and objectives.Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas.Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with natural orifice specimen extraction.Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement Achieving long term survival in oesophagectomy patients aged over 75.Enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Compliance and outcomes of a multicenter study from the Spanish working group on ERAS.Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis.Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population.Perioperative physiotherapy.Enhancing surgical performance outcomes through process-driven care: a systematic review.Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery.Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients.Laparoscopy plus enhanced recovery: optimizing the benefits of MIS through SAGES 'SMART' program.A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients.Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.Fast-track laparoscopic surgery: A better option for treating colorectal cancer than conventional laparoscopic surgery Decreased length of stay and earlier oral feeding associated with standardized postoperative clinical care for total gastrectomies at a cancer center.Enhanced recovery ERAS for elderly: a safe and beneficial pathway in colorectal surgery.Enhanced recovery after surgery-ERAS-principles, practice and feasibility in the elderly.Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery criteria and preoperative and postoperative counselling reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial.Feasibility of Fast-Track Surgery in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer.Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery.Prevenção do tromboembolismo na cirurgia do câncer do aparelho digestivo

P2860

Q24198026-A01315BE-C556-414E-94CC-5AEB0BF3FA10 Q26781457-CCFBF9B4-9431-490E-9280-0833FC430E3D Q26865447-BCBFBD3A-3277-4094-BD32-879981750A38 Q27021976-4FEC0485-BA53-4708-868D-A182A2B60F09 Q30244315-3B2B8DE9-D98B-4A0A-B46D-47F87A972D07 Q33641862-7579E4A1-F676-477A-9676-54103951DE64 Q33691475-8A2DF148-6770-49DA-AB10-3819F83C8D02 Q33996285-96D00227-5DE1-41EE-BDB8-55E135D3DC30 Q34168762-AB2E2BEF-C89E-4790-B07F-596762F18AC6 Q34696986-C6944C76-0C90-41D9-802F-D0BB10ACC6E7 Q35103683-77871345-C6DE-4B56-8EEF-E6EB12C57B58 Q35751685-960EFDDB-B4D7-4378-9F8F-BA018012DBCD Q36373655-B924DAE2-8C0E-46AA-B3D5-56834FBEDB53 Q36376463-8546DBAE-FE1D-4665-A9CF-68BC693295B8 Q36615987-A081649B-2125-4A7F-942E-E99653FB971D Q36818013-E19AB5B3-F3FB-4483-9D1E-80A26722E72F Q37026571-D7A1BB25-CEE4-43EF-91EC-95463B8A33AA Q37184409-F5FFAFC8-55C4-4FEF-A63E-7E125846BF34 Q37408975-68C18BAB-B22B-40F2-984E-BF4F70BB3305 Q37697526-E205D6FA-E6EC-44FC-A8E6-C78749ECB015 Q38079407-8F940AA0-339D-4A60-A974-4D33E4C8CE20 Q38173976-38B55435-0269-41E8-B7F3-029B2041C77B Q38182441-711F3693-5EAE-4138-BC91-F77291F3E760 Q38182444-6EC2D05F-6DA5-4D9E-A80C-AF45737A24C1 Q38197912-9E92D707-847D-450D-ABF4-E551FF680617 Q38231414-CCC13FB9-6F46-421F-8A75-D954B7CD09C6 Q39709715-3090D19E-CD3C-4CD7-8332-84A8345EF73F Q40246553-7B0CB42C-8C56-49D9-940B-D0B16B091A41 Q41020316-79C21356-68D7-40BE-B624-1D702BCC3F80 Q41551384-722872B1-DFD4-466A-B0DB-0B439F4D498D Q42182611-2A56ED93-E61E-4BA0-80B2-5D4A29CA93C1 Q48283515-5DCF2A62-F3B1-486E-85B4-DD63D35BF7AF Q49909753-A30D7813-ECEA-4954-973E-577DDC5CC1F8 Q51714552-B36B7C45-0980-4633-8B26-A8DEDAD9304B Q53516600-0CA15280-C4E0-4CFE-9341-63E136CC207C Q55004933-3D973A52-76F7-4432-81AE-77B3DE009CE4 Q58861106-ACEFD383-828A-4A77-8501-10E48B05E76E

P2860

Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q43939368

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年学术文章

@wuu

2012年学术文章

@zh

2012年学术文章

@zh-cn

2012年学术文章

@zh-hans

2012年学术文章

@zh-my

2012年学术文章

@zh-sg

2012年學術文章

@yue

2012年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@en

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@nl

type

label

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@en

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@nl

prefLabel

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@en

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@nl

P1433

Q43939368-BCD21557-6C8E-4187-B38A-A05EBF861E19

P1476

Q43939368-D501E4F5-BF14-4872-A3F1-78B44358288C

P2093

Q43939368-3C20555A-7EED-4B66-A466-C658C3FEA5AD

Q43939368-5E497588-9BA7-47DD-8352-82B3B70E2874

Q43939368-691B5360-4BBE-41E9-B53F-5F09232D7D9A

Q43939368-A282E9E4-0D2A-4AB5-8D3D-BBD102F8295F

Q43939368-B4236C62-78F4-4C4E-9CB2-991BA8BC169C

Q43939368-BE932256-C5D9-4AC3-90C2-A15928DBC52B

P2860

Q43939368-3BD37C85-BFF8-4AB8-B8BF-27BF1D268EF7

Q43939368-4FE14532-6F41-4288-8D39-E9DAED22B263

Q43939368-9A124E76-DA92-4641-8B63-49805525A98D

Q43939368-B91B6ABF-5B10-4971-9B9C-13ED50604B43

Q43939368-BB6ED507-70A9-452E-840D-C83CB46D4478

Q43939368-C2B1F938-854D-428F-9B5C-AAF455AA4BDF

Q43939368-C5D4BFDC-1624-43CA-BB5A-F088124EAD0A

Q43939368-EE362C61-A2F8-4A3A-A303-03471D64AF9C

Q43939368-F5E4458C-8941-4AE1-B777-2267AFBC7149

P304

Q43939368-01D11376-A1A8-41E3-988A-57A4214C65C1

P31

Q43939368-194CE8D2-D455-4BF3-83B3-D2A14A91E9E1

P356

Q43939368-9A836E3A-9FB5-45BA-A51D-BECC0A8352B3

P433

Q43939368-DFF151E9-A89D-406D-9774-530DE0B8BB84

P478

Q43939368-B4FFD51E-52C6-43E7-A86D-415121512585

P577

Q43939368-487C634C-EE53-4822-99CC-5F367B19FC90

P698

Q43939368-44D923D1-D2EE-4BBE-A3EA-6DF991B45933

P356

J.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

P1433

Colorectal Disease

P1476

Effectiveness of fast-track re ...... patients: a randomized trial.

@en

P2093

C Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Jiang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Suo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Q Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

X Cao

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Y-Q Zhao

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Management of patients in fast track surgery.

Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Mechanical bowel preparation in intestinal surgery: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme.

Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review.

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis.

Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).

Effect of the laxative magnesium oxide on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track colonic resection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.

Reduced length of stay and convalescence in laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection with traditional care: a double blinded randomized clinical trial.

P304

1009-1013

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

14

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2012-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

21985126

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string