Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
about
Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: Why and how?Phenomenological Approaches in Psychology and Health Sciences.General practice: continuous quality improvement since 1948.Creating an interest in research and development as a means of reducing the gap between theory and practice in primary care: an interventional study based on strategic communication.What is depression? Psychiatrists' and GPs' experiences of diagnosis and the diagnostic processKnowledge 'Translation' as social learning: negotiating the uptake of research-based knowledge in practice.A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy.Evidence-based medicine - an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway."Why do they become vulnerable when faced with the challenges of old age?" Elderly people who committed suicide, described by those who knew them.Why suicide? Elderly people who committed suicide and their experience of life in the period before their death.Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine.The significance of professional roles in collaboration on patients' transitions from hospital to home via an intermediate unit.The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is useful and well accepted as part of the clinical assessment for depression and anxiety in primary care: a mixed-methods study.When elderly people give warning of suicide.On a medicine of the whole person: away from scientistic reductionism and towards the embrace of the complex in clinical practice.Elderly people who committed suicide--their contact with the health service. What did they expect, and what did they get?The doctor, his patient, and the computerized evidence-based guideline.Redescribing reflective practice and evidence-based practice discourses.How general practitioners understand and handle medically unexplained symptoms: a focus group study.
P2860
Q30382283-9E9E81AE-96A6-49A3-A7D1-7CC2D6821911Q30429657-AA839B1A-5E88-4515-835E-5B472517A2C5Q34229057-38163345-C719-4A9E-B1AE-F8BC8864CC6EQ34347986-D2EE090C-4169-47CE-AAD9-A4F73486A086Q34474435-92469E50-CA8A-49FE-BC19-CC7DAAD8C7A0Q35939315-2BAC7D27-A49D-4F75-990D-59D754F0149FQ36785903-D6E86443-713E-4A61-834A-02776A345107Q38792638-87652D35-2384-444C-BD51-298444AAB555Q39278931-4896E267-36BA-422E-8C1A-8CDBE01B288FQ39298702-6FB15CC9-3651-4352-BD3E-3FFB3985220FQ40244075-4C489983-813F-4394-A3E4-C621BA8BF878Q43488757-F4F41089-BC16-48AE-811B-D54FD2618052Q47554072-A11F9B9F-7598-483B-AB15-A12BA3FB1985Q48708796-48116E96-1735-4711-B445-B1C89C4B78DEQ48845752-A53464FA-638F-4B07-A610-A411AB60679FQ48963906-A278D406-FF56-4BD4-82BB-953CCC856B7EQ52558315-63341D77-BD85-4394-8049-83DFB29A5955Q53155936-E40DB6D4-F8E6-40A3-B63E-EB4FD688CB70Q55401776-EFA3C121-7C63-4AFE-AB19-3A08BCD95890
P2860
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年学术文章
@wuu
2002年学术文章
@zh
2002年学术文章
@zh-cn
2002年学术文章
@zh-hans
2002年学术文章
@zh-my
2002年学术文章
@zh-sg
2002年學術文章
@yue
2002年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@en
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@nl
type
label
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@en
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@nl
prefLabel
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@en
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Reflexivity and metapositions: strategies for appraisal of clinical evidence.
@en
P2093
Kirsti Malterud
P2860
P304
P356
10.1046/J.1365-2753.2002.00353.X
P577
2002-05-01T00:00:00Z