Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene?
about
An Association of Cancer Physicians' strategy for improving services and outcomes for cancer patientsHow much do tumor stage and treatment explain socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival? Applying causal mediation analysis to population-based data.Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statisticsComparing treatment trends for colorectal cancer in clinical database and cancer registry data: implications for monitoring cancer care.Nomogram Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage and Determination of an Effective Surgical Strategy for Reducing Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.The volume-mortality relation for radical cystectomy in England: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics.Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England after the NHS cancer plan.Estimating and validating disability-adjusted life years at the global level: a methodological framework for cancer.Multi-institutional assessment of sphincter preservation for rectal cancer.Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancerTechniques in total mesorectal excision surgeryVariation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.Utility of contrast enema to assess anastomotic integrity and the natural history of radiological leaks after low rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.The impact of age on outcome after surgery for colorectal adenocarcinomaCancer survival differences between South Asians and non-South Asians of England in 1986-2004, accounting for age at diagnosis and deprivationOutcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision over conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal tumor: a meta-analysisImpact of deprivation on breast cancer survival among women eligible for mammographic screening in the West Midlands (UK) and New South Wales (Australia): Women diagnosed 1997-2006.Current practice in abdominoperineal resection: an email survey of the membership of the Association of Coloproctology.Factors Associated With Oncologic Outcomes Following Abdominoperineal or Intersphincteric Resection in Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: what indications in 2013?Establishing quality in colorectal surgery.Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies.Modern rectal cancer multidisciplinary treatment: the role of radiation and surgery.Permanent stoma rates: a misleading marker of quality in rectal cancer surgery.Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.Socioeconomic deprivation and inpatient complication rates following mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery.The English national low rectal cancer development programme: key messages and future perspectives.Previous transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer represents a risk factor for an increased abdominoperineal resection rate.Does rectal cancer height influence the oncological outcome?Large variation in the use of defunctioning stomas after rectal cancer surgery. A lack of consensus.Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00.Significance of defect closure following transanal local full-thickness excision of rectal malignant tumors.Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with a GelPOINT(®) Path for lower rectal cancer as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with porcine collagen perineal reconstruction (Permacol™): high primary perineal wound healing rates.Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery.Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy.Low abdominoperineal excision rates are associated with high-workload surgeons and lower tumour height. Is further specialization needed?Risk adjusted benchmarking of abdominoperineal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma in the context of the Belgian PROCARE improvement project.
P2860
Q28603931-F3D0515F-6142-4341-B146-F31E43BC8EF4Q31095171-EEA346DF-3348-4796-B3DB-0737DD78978DQ33592527-7E0F544A-EE52-4D18-91D5-74E33CFC5FECQ33631574-1827D74C-2084-4D7D-90A5-756E9C1ABEA4Q33737582-A14BCACD-ABE9-47EA-B8FA-992CCD142CD2Q33743740-85BE58E9-FE62-42B2-A00C-688FBABA098DQ34129380-89878658-CC34-4D04-93AB-B2DC843B8FF8Q34383168-27BD9EED-E62A-4CFA-B7E7-8E9F099778DEQ34610674-BF799FC2-DA41-46EB-90E8-2C37D2FA8A01Q34657323-155B32BF-1D4A-4813-9BC8-FEF6EB13C920Q35109120-A68EF99F-DECF-4703-AB04-82E97C9595B6Q35166787-E55412D8-EBCD-44CB-A78F-ADF87D2BC300Q35617216-07D49DC1-5E88-43C3-A0F1-BC53F6444018Q36014170-58BA7CED-5E94-4EC0-B0BE-C65AE9AE9662Q36286640-743FA43E-B93C-4DDB-9E84-F6E43FF4DC70Q36317347-A2F234AA-F4A0-4FEE-99BE-7BD59B2D3E4FQ36802176-817E55CF-C429-41EC-9EEC-E730536DBF7CQ36993771-4CB6207F-A767-46FB-BFE2-0D32DC28EB2FQ37016853-E05F9E81-8B2D-44E5-A7CC-B1C41FD6A8B9Q37094342-5CAF61BF-BB5A-46EA-B00D-57839F9A7616Q37609147-B3AE4E3E-BD00-4790-B829-D73F4C2356FBQ37769272-FF560848-41DA-4C7A-A2D5-C69B2420F758Q37878381-08F4F03F-100C-40FB-8ADA-5DCB2283A798Q37895253-B79D724C-D973-4200-9109-AC5B67FD01BDQ38100653-CA2EF813-F6ED-4C0D-A48C-4F08BDEDAD0FQ38168287-8060CA4C-B34B-44A8-B5DD-F1F893BC0541Q38327481-583C4E63-4F81-4F6A-B3CF-1116632C5C23Q39103192-E6C1A24B-C15D-45F7-83A5-7A3B2F65EBA7Q39309470-BD6C20F1-1F32-4F44-8D84-65F6A9C01E29Q39453800-820C7464-A08F-424F-AC2A-A51E694FE222Q40204296-A7105E41-AC62-4DBF-920A-61FE18CAC673Q40452126-BB1537DB-1C71-443E-8A5B-FB6CBEEC4F14Q40551143-16C3428F-6F52-4C62-AA7A-608046F41B10Q41195556-CE4C4926-AA13-42AB-87DD-062394FAB808Q42055291-1955048A-C89D-4C2C-BBEE-4F20B70693FAQ42674150-4B4205F8-9502-4BEF-9BDB-48E067903D71Q43331250-12ECF992-321E-44AD-B399-300F4CC3DF5CQ43413818-612BBC06-FDE1-4831-9FEC-D92EF6A1A876Q43446555-903FBF26-CF03-479A-9539-479BCEAAAEEDQ43644545-6849C8AF-AADF-45C7-A244-CC3BD600AD32
P2860
Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene?
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en-gb
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@nl
type
label
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en-gb
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@nl
prefLabel
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en-gb
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@nl
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Unacceptable variation in abdo ...... tal cancer: time to intervene?
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1136/GUT.2007.137877
P407
P577
2008-06-05T00:00:00Z