Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
about
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?Endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingEvaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patients.[Comparison of two prognostic scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Antananarivo]Weekend and nighttime effect on the prognosis of peptic ulcer bleeding.Prediction scores or gastroenterologists' Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleedingSupratherapeutic anticoagulation at presentation is associated with reduced mortality in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhageDoes Preendoscopy Rockall Score Safely Identify Low Risk Patients following Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage?Endoscopic Evaluation of Upper and Lower Gastro-Intestinal BleedingWhy do mortality rates for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding differ around the world? A systematic review of cohort studies.Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleedingThe Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort StudyComparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Endoscopic management of refractory gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding using Histoacryl (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) glue.Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment.Multidisciplinary management strategies for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2015, Nanchang, China).Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.The Novel Scoring System for 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.Early lactate clearance for predicting active bleeding in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scoresComparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleedingUrgent endoscopy in severe non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: does the Glasgow-Blatchford score help endoscopists?New and emerging endoscopic haemostasis techniques.Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population.Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.Letter: is blood transfusion really a risk factor for rebleeding in nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding?Letter: is blood transfusion really a risk factor for rebleeding in nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding? Authors' reply.A novel scoring system for prediction of esophageal varices in critically ill patients.
P2860
Q26766658-C45075C5-355C-4352-A509-9538BD60E3B0Q27021001-2246B043-8423-48AC-8B4B-2F22268A4D21Q33167040-326C5EB4-2B51-463B-8EB5-4828F8BC48EFQ33615491-87BF41CA-EF9E-4E5A-99FE-91833E006404Q34289968-5B21CDDD-2E7B-4FA7-AE20-57663A82A661Q34418696-5DA21426-90A0-4231-8F62-A69E47593ADFQ35579679-C2116F33-7D61-409C-BBEF-D5D9EF2B2FD4Q35672478-32B7F555-7426-4D5D-AC39-7BA93FFB2E78Q36050242-903B9A50-3905-495C-BA23-17493CCB8EECQ36149454-36CF8646-4861-485D-B10C-7675D98B74ECQ36416896-C3E7137F-DBC0-462B-96FA-7FEF433C947DQ36848935-35432384-4199-49EA-972A-024C8A1BFCA8Q37066351-B619316A-E9C4-4558-A1BC-28D7BA289CEAQ37158135-5D5FCEFA-33DE-4A65-B861-BE760E580688Q37567350-06CF57CC-4D17-4A7E-BEC2-927C339402B2Q37666495-56C55576-8E9B-4191-8678-BE25B81F7233Q38063422-09C49C8D-121F-4224-ADEE-350A30E70B4FQ38166285-5F1904E1-236F-48FA-9DE7-71E133D0AC34Q38743469-B1F8577E-7367-4501-8F14-4426D30D1261Q38911184-3467C9F2-5FFD-4023-BD89-775F012A650AQ38948455-4070096D-0C43-4083-BBFC-7500BC1CB226Q39611009-E36D1B57-5576-4617-AC47-62BDA2D65B82Q39964420-47BF60A3-2677-49DF-A8FF-E242A854D1B5Q40356950-E1346DDD-E1D4-481B-ABC2-6A26EA428CC9Q40675773-3C105769-4A9B-4EAF-8572-88118784E858Q40935304-48DA1A24-A137-4B4E-A848-0DC95B998681Q41546504-210EC51E-5A04-4D34-8691-286FB0CA1CBBQ41628835-BA715FF9-7E74-4D81-9F54-01CE83E4860FQ41642122-02670D8F-ADB5-4F7B-8541-819EE87CCC5CQ41678520-F0B6DB17-5145-4657-B201-42B96FB62485Q41974858-91BC70CF-7805-4C20-92F6-AFD0FDF78056Q42293568-6F213261-BA54-445C-B393-DEB2F771C6A9Q42293583-480F806F-9D10-4452-A0C1-C4D9CB8A0007Q42771971-FE6D9595-6C18-460D-A681-D69B3C08532CQ43271470-FF175E9B-6C3E-4141-A662-2E0E37EAAF6CQ44074911-405D1D44-0967-4115-8FBB-202ED9D12718Q44856467-4C8EA514-02FC-409D-A4EE-0A9648C153BDQ45800274-96C375EB-7A12-4514-B2E7-7A16CB4B7B4CQ46123935-5FAE7423-090A-45DD-8C03-C0DDFA15F68AQ47097429-86797964-51C7-4149-9166-5A9B86CF4774
P2860
Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@en
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@nl
type
label
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@en
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@nl
prefLabel
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@en
Multicentre comparison of the ...... gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Multicentre comparison of the ...... r gastrointestinal haemorrhage
@en
P2093
E Thompson
O Blatchford
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2036.2011.04747.X
P407
P577
2011-06-26T00:00:00Z