Positive family environment predicts improvement in symptoms and social functioning among adolescents at imminent risk for onset of psychosis.
about
The empirical status of the ultra high-risk (prodromal) research paradigmThe role of pain-related anxiety in adolescents' disability and social impairment: ALSPAC data.Predicting the longitudinal effects of the family environment on prodromal symptoms and functioning in patients at-risk for psychosisYouth-caregiver agreement on clinical high-risk symptoms of psychosis.Caregiver reports of patient-initiated violence in psychosis.Perceptions of family criticism and warmth and their link to symptom expression in racially/ethnically diverse adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis.Family-focused therapy for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: treatment fidelity within a multisite randomized trial.Effects of multidimensional treatment foster care on psychotic symptoms in girlsSelf-reported coping strategies in families of patients in early stages of psychotic disorder: an exploratory studyRelatives' emotional involvement moderates the effects of family therapy for bipolar disorderGender differences in outcomes in people with schizophrenia in rural China: 14-year follow-up studyResting cortisol level, self-concept, and putative familial environment in adolescents at ultra high-risk for psychotic disorders.Family Perception and 6-Month Symptomatic and Functioning Outcomes in Young Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis in a General Population in ChinaCriticism and Depression among the Caregivers of At-Risk Mental State and First-Episode Psychosis Patients.Environmental Risk and Protective Factors and Their Influence on the Emergence of PsychosisThe relation between schizotypy and early attention to rejecting interactions: The influence of neuroticism.An Interpersonal CBT Framework for Involving Relatives in Interventions for Psychosis: Evidence Base and Clinical ImplicationsProgress and Future Directions in Research on the Psychosis Prodrome: A Review for Clinicians.Gender differences in symptoms, functioning and social support in patients at ultra-high risk for developing a psychotic disorderComparable family burden in families of clinical high-risk and recent-onset psychosis patientsFamily problem solving interactions and 6-month symptomatic and functional outcomes in youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis and with recent onset psychotic symptoms: a longitudinal study.A randomized trial of family focused therapy with populations at clinical high risk for psychosis: effects on interactional behavior.Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review.Measuring attachment and parental bonding in psychosis and its clinical implications.Attachment styles and clinical correlates in people at ultra high risk for psychosis.The role of a family history of psychosis for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis.Development of a group and family-based cognitive behavioural therapy program for youth at risk for psychosis.The Effects of Group Psychoeducational Programme on Attitude toward Mental Illness in Families of Patients with Schizophrenia, 2014Risk and Protective Factors, Perceptions of Family Environment, Ethnicity, and Schizophrenia Symptoms.Treatment of people at ultra-high risk for psychosisPsychological Flexibility as a Buffer against Caregiver Distress in Families with Psychosis.A randomized trial of family focused treatment for adolescents and young adults at risk for psychosis: study rationale, design and methods.The mediating effect of family cohesion in reducing patient symptoms and family distress in a culturally informed family therapy for schizophrenia: A parallel-process latent-growth model.Metacognitive beliefs as psychological predictors of social functioning: An investigation with young people at risk of psychosis.Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.Positive affect in the family environment protects against relapse in first-episode psychosis.Mental health recovery and quilting: evaluation of a grass-roots project in a small, rural, Australian Christian church.Neurocognitive and familial moderators of psychiatric risk in velocardiofacial (22q11.2 deletion) syndrome: a longitudinal study.Adolescent family perceptions in the At-Risk Mental State for psychosis.Delusional belief flexibility and informal caregiving relationships in psychosis: a potential cognitive route for the protective effect of social support.
P2860
Q22242833-3C935D7D-CD53-4844-9D2B-0D25C4E25249Q30868436-BA753CC2-9392-4755-8E90-313635FDCC66Q33798522-FEBD6B09-40C3-40EB-B65C-4222570CD7ABQ33820520-27D81E65-1FBC-4802-8013-8A3BC0F10C6FQ33861582-0A009728-A8B8-4B03-A9F4-89B9AC5B4671Q34098488-F90B13D4-8132-4DED-AF87-5AEAACB86A0CQ34324854-97BB5498-6B86-4BB8-B8FE-D514DD11AE98Q34626194-629E2C63-F3DA-455E-B5B3-5C1099087B26Q34806610-E387BD28-0AAB-4D20-861F-3F1B78A9A9F0Q35072542-26DD564F-1BA4-4BE8-A17C-8BCBBCE66E08Q35237346-3508D850-551B-493C-9B78-82BBBAEC1D23Q35624912-875BA4AA-3366-4CC5-AE00-808746034A33Q35783608-26043479-7932-4F7B-84A9-9958D89F47F9Q35936921-57571526-EE9A-4647-ADD2-B6AB89053AA7Q36367296-E035E5C6-666B-4AC8-B8EE-0DF9E570F32BQ36519030-FA62626F-F902-49C1-AE26-27F911E7DBB7Q36688561-AB0C4ED7-DA71-4B29-8ED3-93B34D546BD6Q36910682-1D6CD65F-07B2-417B-B5E0-545E7BDC9CEFQ37032774-0B0CB315-81FE-4816-81DE-205F13C0E917Q37143518-720E01E9-D244-4886-8A1E-90468DEF1F0EQ37332880-4FBC4D2B-12DB-4036-979E-24EEDBD27E0FQ37540848-9BFA1302-8683-4E4F-BD49-409DE4647A11Q38029438-0FE5CF3F-6A38-469D-B94D-76A8EA737B10Q38293625-E5810515-E14B-410C-8973-D3C04C625067Q38401418-D32FD071-2709-41F8-B685-AC357DFBC937Q38644962-5012E8B3-C2F5-4727-886E-25528255ABBFQ39273121-E45791F8-256D-4D99-BC11-735CB79E3A5CQ40434501-A3B0E7DD-21C8-4796-8B54-519EBAFAC94EQ40664172-BDCACB0E-0EB0-403B-B954-F7D4108F7607Q41832611-468C4EBC-669B-4550-8628-01F7CDC8E976Q42372807-3E27756C-466E-4EF5-8E81-62805924A53DQ42743182-26379DD5-EBFA-4BAB-8404-CEB089D8A142Q47571042-B99DC972-51D0-4931-9AC9-B41341D67C72Q47614867-96121551-3B49-44F0-ABEA-3ED83F5E7CF2Q47621148-A091FA81-BE8B-4EED-93F4-C6E9A97DA84AQ47973693-73267F06-A33D-45BC-9A2C-6B2B63A34DA4Q48080874-9EAFFFE8-F709-45B7-B8FA-31C4024BF522Q50623853-34ADAC77-C1AF-4F18-9EAA-9DC8969CD575Q50674345-34653AA5-DD7B-4DA2-B0E3-7F17995616DFQ50682762-455BF047-4E10-43B8-8F55-2A566A693D85
P2860
Positive family environment predicts improvement in symptoms and social functioning among adolescents at imminent risk for onset of psychosis.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@en
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@nl
type
label
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@en
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@nl
prefLabel
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@en
Positive family environment pr ...... t risk for onset of psychosis.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Positive family environment pr ...... nt risk for onset of psychosis
@en
P2093
Carrie E Bearden
Jamie L Gordon
Mary P O'Brien
Steve R Lopez
P304
P356
10.1016/J.SCHRES.2005.10.005
P407
P577
2005-11-23T00:00:00Z