Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
about
Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods studyPrimary care physicians' experiences with electronic medical records: implementation experience in community, urban, hospital, and academic family medicineIncentivised case finding for depression in patients with chronic heart disease and diabetes in primary care: an ethnographic study.The INCENTIVE protocol: an evaluation of the organisation and delivery of NHS dental healthcare to patients-innovation in the commissioning of primary dental care service delivery and organisation in the UK.Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions.General practitioners' views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study'Just another incentive scheme': a qualitative interview study of a local pay-for-performance scheme for primary carePrimary care evidence in clinical guidelines: a mixed methods study of practitioners' views.Does higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions?Exception reporting in the Quality and Outcomes Framework: views of practice staff - a qualitative study.A study of general practitioners' perspectives on electronic medical records systems in NHSScotlandThe use of outcome and process indicators to incentivize integrated care for frail older people: a case study of primary care services in Sweden.Quality assurance in psychiatry: quality indicators and guideline implementation.Improvement in the management of gout is vital and overdue: an audit from a UK primary care medical practice.The Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations: a qualitative studyExperience of contractual change in UK general practice: a qualitative study of salaried GPs.Patients' views of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study.Relations between task delegation and job satisfaction in general practice: a systematic literature review.Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.Associations between degrees of task delegation and job satisfaction of general practitioners and their staff: a cross-sectional study.Monitoring quality in Israeli primary care: The primary care physicians' perspective.Incentivised chronic disease management and the inverse equity hypothesis: findings from a longitudinal analysis of Scottish primary care practice-level dataImplementation of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study 8 years after introductionInfluences of organizational features of healthcare settings on clinical decision making: qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment.Getting (Along) With the Guidelines: Reconciling Patient Autonomy and Quality Improvement Through Shared Decision Making.Management of common gastrointestinal disorders: quality criteria based on patients' views and practice guidelines.Shaping dental contract reform: a clinical and cost-effective analysis of incentive-driven commissioning for improved oral health in primary dental care.The impact of nonphysician clinicians: do they improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care services?How could the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) do more to tackle health inequalities?The role of Government policy in supporting nurse-led care in general practice in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia: an adapted realist review.Scoping the role and education needs of practice nurses in London.Pharmacists' perceptions of pay for performance versus fee-for-service remuneration for the management of hypertension through pharmacist prescribing.Compliance with quality prescribing indicators linked to financial incentives: what about not incentivized indicators?: an observational study.Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.Work motivation among healthcare professionals.Work motivation, task delegation and job satisfaction of general practice staff: a cross-sectional study.Process measures or patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for comparing performance across providers? A study of measures related to access and continuity in Swedish primary care.Financial incentive schemes in primary care.What more can we learn from early learning theory? The contemporary relevance for behaviour change interventions.
P2860
Q30829853-727C1693-D075-46DA-B4AB-C446B4921043Q33601832-6013502B-EB1B-4EB3-87F4-46B133F7D737Q34071826-61AA2DEA-A54C-434F-91FB-BC4BED56B7AFQ34198203-ABCC86BE-CD3C-454B-87F4-76B2DBF867D7Q34234502-AAFE21FB-8C87-4E36-A727-D4F94D3651C3Q34400228-0C9E8430-EBBF-4496-8DCD-8CEBF360DD13Q34414989-EDBDB8C5-6C68-4C4B-96EF-802F578FBF1AQ34423029-EF679CB8-1C7A-4E45-AA28-85B48F3F5BACQ34452593-698AF177-5A14-4739-AC12-11DC5E9CF810Q34554658-50E2898C-80E4-4013-AE4D-96BAEBB4FBCAQ34711928-AF93C8F6-B202-417A-AD9A-BAB4F50E8074Q34729012-AEA088B8-1B32-4B2C-8C26-B13B8B22F046Q34743929-6E4CF788-5D65-4E65-A0D1-000E059B7963Q34901808-4E5E9524-1C35-4098-87F6-495865EF35FAQ35041871-172D51A9-A97D-4F6C-92BC-EB6BBE2BD576Q35224178-77FDFB64-B4E0-4C32-849E-FAC59AE3F223Q35845704-ECBF2B04-5DFB-4EB3-B581-701FB36F342DQ35916794-A60D6665-8283-4C1D-8A78-00588F078DB6Q36207086-53D37CA9-B8D4-4381-95D5-C3D403899F05Q36222903-FFB7C215-7A3C-4FFA-8974-21DEA13E2A83Q36251900-2E0E4D7C-4E7E-4E5E-8185-184D64F5B338Q36320052-F3D5C81C-E470-4CC7-A825-816B36B10824Q36342448-BA940C3F-9770-4D87-A200-D81EF4AC99EFQ36870608-69DB7CD5-2B07-49B7-B2E5-3B60D04904A5Q36929593-F29770B4-5B10-4DA1-8E24-A1B4792B9077Q37036719-65D2E515-2F6B-4A95-9B80-0A94D61FFD43Q37206594-23FC5625-C4F1-4739-850C-833DF9F606EFQ37251688-CDA9B685-193C-4372-80C8-BF7A42DF271CQ37625615-A6E59C8A-C342-422E-8BFC-88457802BA75Q37671674-A5F428F3-2426-4111-83B4-7FA86F460FE6Q37954429-7FF84018-F872-454B-AD26-4F87C1AC1320Q38739321-B8251CB9-07E3-46E1-AFFA-74416EC888EDQ38769178-3B1ABBAC-B8DC-4DA7-A11A-E2558C66BC7EQ44651617-2651529E-B830-4589-AAA2-AB61AA65C333Q47315369-7FBC430A-4DA9-4B89-B9B7-0911BFA4757BQ47322856-3747CC5F-F05B-43EA-BC2B-F1E07C4F003EQ47369364-C59FF18D-15F2-4632-ACC1-1430F45B955BQ47979942-E13B8B66-FB7F-4319-833A-47F869FA9F46Q49268920-2CC47A8B-A153-47FE-9208-9675C7885419Q50554440-8DF2D554-280F-4842-884C-03027801B9CB
P2860
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@en
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@nl
type
label
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@en
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@nl
prefLabel
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@en
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
@en
P2093
Amanda Howe
Nick Steel
Robert Fleetcroft
Stephen Gillam
Susan Maisey
P2860
P304
P356
10.1258/JHSRP.2008.007118
P577
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z