Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
about
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing countryQuestionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement.European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.No One Likes a Snitch.A theoretical comparison of the models of prevention of research misconduct.
P2860
Q21132700-2DC0FAB5-7D65-40ED-8364-8A906DE86EDEQ35130558-C49819D3-2795-42F7-96D7-6700314A69C8Q36303806-22EA218E-D676-4132-A5AC-CD1F5E1BAD82Q37623533-DA817B61-F29C-4FA5-BC2E-2BDE086F407AQ47574134-3AFBAE2B-6B0E-4241-9225-B5CF9D7DF855Q48073112-E7228137-540F-4747-9F9D-BE63A0E8D6F7Q48857597-0D43B55A-9592-4938-B57B-04872B8060E2
P2860
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@en
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@nl
type
label
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@en
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@nl
prefLabel
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@en
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
@en
P2860
P356
10.1080/15265160500313242
P577
2005-09-01T00:00:00Z