A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
about
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?Therapeutic upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in Paediatric GastroenterologyEvaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patients.Consensus on control of risky nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Taiwan with National Health Insurance.Prophylactic tracheal intubation for upper GI bleeding: A meta-analysisValidity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleedingGuidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleedingClinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal HemorrhageGlasgow Blatchford Score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods studyEmergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.Arterial lactate does not predict outcome better than existing risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
P2860
Q26766658-6A527A84-C138-426A-B999-55D2E310FED4Q26828943-AC8BFE48-11A2-425C-ABE8-6C5407FD5285Q33167040-9C6FA681-27F3-45C9-B972-4C1DD6E3808EQ34100357-168E7940-BC1D-4353-A698-292AD55AB97DQ35136542-18A7C11E-F446-4940-AC46-5A326E900958Q36416896-29702642-DD46-4D6E-924F-D7893CF0DFEAQ38743469-1FBA4E3E-040F-4EAB-B9DB-63176CF8EF16Q38948455-5654B94F-20D3-4409-90FE-BBB77BF614B1Q39611009-B33CFBE1-7888-40C2-8043-0657536F36CCQ40356950-780F7647-78FD-4860-848C-8D18966D0D56Q41678520-A3E4FF5F-9CA7-4086-AB5B-720B81C2651CQ41907667-1BCAC96A-3880-4C75-9D01-B81404A244B0Q42367656-83A6788F-30A0-4675-8EEB-26F0BCB8C4A2Q44856467-0FE27729-D8BA-4EE8-B0A6-71C67CA5A783Q47657429-730F0864-AD1C-4F95-B457-740135224326Q47919690-F8BCE111-C044-4D3D-8078-D968D74D1807
P2860
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@en
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@nl
type
label
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@en
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@nl
prefLabel
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@en
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@nl
P2093
P1476
A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
@en
P2093
Cheng-Hsien Wang
Chia-Jung Yang
I-Chuan Chen
Yu-Wei Chen
Yui-Rwei Young
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AJEM.2013.01.007
P407
P577
2013-03-01T00:00:00Z