The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
about
The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a systematic reviewPegfilgrastim on the Same Day Versus Next Day of Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of Four Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Phase II Studies.Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy.Efficacy and safety of early G-CSF administration in patients with head and neck cancer treated by docetaxel-cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF protocol): a retrospective study.Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33).Pegfilgrastim administration after 24 or 72 or 96 h to allow dose-dense anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a single-center experience within the GIM2 randomized phase III trial.Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015."Same-Day" administration of pegfilgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: clinical practice and provider rationale.Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of pegfilgrastim administered by two delivery methods: on-body injector and manual injection with a prefilled syringe.
P2860
Q29994513-52801C14-DC2D-4984-9441-72B36451004DQ33846178-FF498F1F-D418-4BF9-962F-35F099F1F25CQ36723903-FE3C2C3A-5934-4DB6-BF6A-E7ABF9604605Q36762853-588CFAB0-97EA-4335-BBB6-4DAF60D43748Q39193669-BF39C2E4-EBB2-4284-BE87-175EACE8830CQ39297322-23FB9D36-0B45-40C6-AD66-8ED1221ED79DQ40346049-038F2EE6-93D1-4C82-9590-59B1C59F4545Q41453238-6E0A9374-9A2F-4B11-88ED-ED95927AB28FQ47657705-BF3F1F48-0A25-46DA-AF1B-15ABAA107F57Q47668200-BA946CC2-41BF-4F68-A699-A21C71909C9DQ53161630-FF21B6B8-B438-4C34-A077-0F2ABEE6025AQ53534502-5040E3FD-DD80-468C-A633-66E422D74451
P2860
The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@en
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@nl
type
label
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@en
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@nl
prefLabel
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@en
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
The safety and efficacy of day ...... for gynecologic malignancies.
@en
P2093
J Michael Straughn
James E Kendrick
Jenny M Whitworth
Kellie S Matthews
Kimberly A Shipman
Larry C Kilgore
T Michael Numnum
P304
P356
10.1016/J.YGYNO.2008.10.025
P407
P577
2008-12-24T00:00:00Z