about
Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnosticsDo Health Professionals Need Additional Competencies for Stratified Cancer Prevention Based on Genetic Risk Profiling?Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectivesLay perceptions of predictive testing for diabetes based on DNA test results versus family history assessment: a focus group studyStakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscapeParents' perceived vulnerability and perceived control in preventing Meningococcal C infection: a large-scale interview study about vaccination.Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counsellingUsing family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.What do people want to know about NIPT? Content analysis of questions emailed to national NIPT information websites.What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?Do consanguineous parents of a child affected by an autosomal recessive disease have more DNA identical-by-descent than similarly-related parents with healthy offspring? Design of a case-control study.Factors for successful implementation of population-based expanded carrier screening: learning from existing initiatives.Developing a framework for implementation of genetic services: learning from examples of testing for monogenic forms of common diseases.Preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis and haemoglobinopathies: what determines the intention to participate or not and actual participation?Ethnic differences and parental beliefs are important for overweight prevention and management in children: a cross-sectional study in the NetherlandsChallenges in the care for consanguineous couples: an exploratory interview study among general practitioners and midwives.Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screeningThe effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial.Using web-based familial risk information for diabetes prevention: a randomized controlled trial.Evaluation of cystic fibrosis carrier screening programs according to genetic screening criteria.Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumersEffect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levelsCausal beliefs and perceptions of risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, The Netherlands, 2007.Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.Attitudes of general practitioners and midwives towards ethnicity-based haemoglobinopathy-carrier screeningDo people from the Jewish community prefer ancestry-based or pan-ethnic expanded carrier screening?Ethnicity, educational level and attitudes contribute to parental intentions about genetic testing for child obesity.Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010Attitudes of cystic fibrosis patients and parents toward carrier screening and related reproductive issues.Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children: What Can We Learn From Adult Screening Programs?Impact of communicating familial risk of diabetes on illness perceptions and self-reported behavioral outcomes: a randomized controlled trialFamily history of diabetes: exploring perceptions of people at risk in the Netherlands.Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study.Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.Sustained effects of online genetics education: a randomized controlled trial on oncogenetics.Consanguineous marriage and reproductive risk: attitudes and understanding of ethnic groups practising consanguinity in Western society.
P50
Q27023696-B68ADAF7-77DE-4F5C-9CB0-329544EFD5C3Q28084601-D765B64F-3DD4-4982-B337-72ECA1AC6691Q30498452-30C28A25-07E9-45C8-A38F-6B2F014B2FA6Q30503462-7DB4C893-6DEC-4E77-9929-7C250C1F19FBQ30839059-8DB7E59B-E2D1-4D04-8940-2D40AD16106BQ33317815-044DF0E3-2B23-40F8-A01E-3B8FB422961CQ33373818-A738F11D-0A59-4B35-80FF-8C16BD26C221Q33577414-5525F7D3-8C87-409A-85A7-2DD779AF73D6Q33628632-3C09DD26-B08A-4CAC-8D90-246D234C116AQ33634130-924748E0-F8A6-4EF5-8DFC-98CA60E792FCQ33634621-29739935-DB13-4581-833A-5D0D66414E90Q33647164-77ADB26D-034C-4A40-97CD-466637ECA218Q34156862-09FB4F3E-688C-4BBE-BE3B-060C7729DD97Q34326885-D84CA4D5-B024-474B-BDDC-478A9B9906FBQ34443395-8EE048B0-C515-4BAF-AC95-D85F4C475A15Q34458626-25267961-9F8E-44B0-B779-D4D58F24578AQ34508235-3D69433B-5F3B-491F-A4AC-5FC735B1BF63Q34693902-1EB71026-9D5E-4655-89D0-C8B9A9B53E64Q34727624-E4FBB365-41B6-43A0-A1F6-4E9506A52386Q34781236-FBE803F9-4C1D-48DC-973F-78D03E0CDEB1Q34815598-4FEBB755-16C5-4E5C-8D7F-A5147EDA3744Q35249385-650F1B58-5F2B-495C-8A54-C3E8A953E36AQ35565792-76F532C0-F762-4A42-8519-17722F5A1F60Q36086286-46DE659A-C08C-41A4-91AC-39233D0E524BQ36184534-5EC3E911-C1E3-4C06-B698-C41BDA09E1DEQ36333982-CB2CA94B-F582-4220-A6C8-AFE512BEC8E8Q36475085-7A2BE169-D7CA-4527-815C-C398B34F02EDQ36884587-13D81188-5133-44E3-85D3-E639CD2CA28AQ36902740-A2229C59-F476-4B11-90A7-04693B7E69CBQ37043825-446F4A2C-A2DE-4BC1-BD0F-5D0509CFAD50Q37058044-793A1034-6BA5-4EF6-A1B0-0F7C3F6171B1Q37069579-8696CC11-51AB-42D1-A09D-2335F79DCD36Q37139468-07D0B894-9BF1-4F6C-9DC4-7FEEE3098D0CQ37206084-48E5C3F2-1444-4E05-BDD0-6A338E5E0EE2Q37528195-02403693-132A-49B1-A7F4-C3E32689BFE6Q37555616-CA3831A2-76C2-4F91-98B0-21B7A0B672ECQ37557986-474938BE-E548-4BFE-B77F-A44C6881A3F8Q37558281-EC29BC07-EB2E-44B3-9EF0-586DDF09D91CQ37585907-F6D70D6C-CF6F-4D5A-80DA-05FC7594165AQ37636712-C87EF90E-75EC-492B-9DFE-BA29350B315B
P50
description
onderzoeker
@nl
name
Lidewij Henneman
@ast
Lidewij Henneman
@en
Lidewij Henneman
@es
Lidewij Henneman
@nl
Lidewij Henneman
@sl
type
label
Lidewij Henneman
@ast
Lidewij Henneman
@en
Lidewij Henneman
@es
Lidewij Henneman
@nl
Lidewij Henneman
@sl
prefLabel
Lidewij Henneman
@ast
Lidewij Henneman
@en
Lidewij Henneman
@es
Lidewij Henneman
@nl
Lidewij Henneman
@sl
P106
P21
P31
P569
2000-01-01T00:00:00Z