Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair.
about
Options for closure of the infected abdomenDecellularized musculofascial extracellular matrix for tissue engineeringFactors affecting hernia recurrence after Strattice mesh repair: a retrospective studyPreclinical animal study and human clinical trial data of co-electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and fibrinogen mesh for anterior pelvic floor reconstructionComparison of Cross-linked and Non-Cross-linked Acellular Porcine Dermal Scaffolds for Long-term Full-Thickness Hernia Repair in a Small Animal Model.Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non-cross-linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual-Institutional Experience.Repair of abdominal wall defects with biodegradable laminar prostheses: polymeric or biological?Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.Metrics of cellular and vascular infiltration of human acellular dermal matrix in ventral hernia repairsTwo cross-linked porcine dermal implants in a single patient undergoing hernia repairCritical analysis of Strattice performance in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: intermediate-risk patients and early complicationsMinimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs.Process-induced extracellular matrix alterations affect the mechanisms of soft tissue repair and regeneration.Desmoid Fibromatosis of the Abdominal Wall: Surgical Resection and Reconstruction with Biological Matrix Egis®A preliminary comparison study of two noncrosslinked biologic meshes used in complex ventral hernia repairs.Use of permacol in parietal and general surgery: a bibliographic review.Bioprosthetic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias utilizing biological mesh and soft-tissue reconstruction: a single center experience.Bioprosthetic tissue matrices in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.Biomaterials: so many choices, so little time. What are the differences?Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options.Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.Cross-linking of porcine acellular dermal matrices negatively affects induced neovessel formation using platelet-rich plasma in a rat model of hernia repair.Chest wall reconstruction with strattice in an immunosuppressed patient.First human use of hybrid synthetic/biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a multicenter trial.Is biological mesh interposition a valid option for complex or recurrent rectovaginal fistula?Reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with biologic mesh after resection of a desmoid tumor in a patient with a Gardner's syndrome.Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up-a prospective, consecutive cohort study.Repair of giant subcostal hernia using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) with bone anchors and pedicled omental flap coverage: a case reportAdipose-derived stem-cell-seeded non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix increases cellular infiltration, vascular infiltration, and mechanical strength of ventral hernia repairs.Full incorporation of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix in a reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a case report.Long-term outcome of biologic graft: a case report.Complex rectovaginal fistula repair with non-cross-linked porcine graft augmentation.Abdominal wall reconstruction using a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold: a follow-up study.Extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal behavior of several biological meshes currently used to repair abdominal wall defects.Dermal collagen matrices for ventral hernia repair: comparative analysis in a rat model.Comparative analysis of histopathologic responses to implanted porcine biologic meshes.Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) for the assessment of hernia mesh integration: a comparison to standard histology in an experimental model.Effects of collagen prosthesis cross-linking on long-term tissue regeneration following the repair of an abdominal wall defect.The Preparation of Acellular Dermal Matrices by Freeze-Thawing and Ultrasonication Process and the Evaluation of Its Antigenicity.
P2860
Q27010663-5BD3F3A6-1EA9-4CEE-A995-788BA28C77BCQ27330238-29824D3A-C40C-4ED3-8F71-AD8695FC81A6Q29007178-E9E4377A-A71F-4A1A-B1F4-3CABD4E57AACQ31047760-99B51DC5-83F6-41E5-A131-B05B2BEBDF46Q33785636-B9DB290B-D74A-41F2-B6F7-FBE1F27C8083Q33890963-D9C29C2B-15AD-47A1-921A-B6E5578A65DEQ34534263-3F304355-B55E-4996-8E49-79EB055DE774Q35765739-EC1EACD5-0F58-4CDC-AB3E-F4448FF9C37AQ35861564-140F594F-7D3F-4516-B705-AAD15BE034C0Q36703165-015B8631-369C-4BD7-9F5D-9466DAA945D3Q37311121-5EF3903D-72B6-425B-B526-FB84D1E54CA6Q37467479-C60AD935-6917-48EF-97EF-53CE2DFB6C45Q37590753-BA5ADD78-C94C-4351-B1A8-C5D8DE8D1198Q37695123-C313931D-792E-4986-A5AB-EA512F6FC5C5Q37998865-2FF669A1-9161-4119-95D6-C1C4ACB91D0AQ38018552-113F98E9-304F-4DAC-901B-ECBA1FFA7F2BQ38078355-FB6CF4A0-3041-4435-B63D-B50DD1516039Q38175832-15279F10-2855-407C-8593-C68D4F1FB542Q38257539-14393D38-6C46-45C8-B877-DEFD8D1613BEQ38272968-3A83956B-9077-4F33-B612-6EB5A386732AQ38352535-CD1A7189-6A34-43AD-932E-EEA87A841A9FQ38800516-69976577-A70B-472E-BD0B-17219499C59DQ39026692-CBBB6689-3BDC-44D5-82FF-9F459602B7B6Q39352247-592BA77F-4887-4B59-8ECB-84738E68CE35Q40126928-8004ED46-F996-4AFA-B551-25CA0C14D250Q40191455-88320402-8FE9-46AC-B617-C8C51BD35432Q40571064-1C3B827F-0B94-4E43-8AF5-7E32B5FC210CQ40898712-1E838F47-21F5-45F2-988C-BB215E2FD111Q41894751-6FA6E7A9-86BC-45E6-B0A1-92E99E36AF79Q42284593-3A82A00E-6BCD-4ECA-BDD0-AA9ADED8DFB1Q42582253-1378AE8C-81E3-464F-806A-7C76E249C642Q42775118-FF9DEB1B-6232-4ACC-AC82-A75F718D7FF4Q43682801-1B002AAA-E730-4621-8BFF-18B47C42D3B9Q43959914-9637E5E6-7AFC-4F23-B88B-DC134854C416Q50469754-E848A56F-33A3-43F3-8845-CADFC4B45C00Q53202860-E4743022-6D98-49C2-8389-F68220F0C112Q53649897-74B9423F-5EB8-4E57-95A2-0BAC6FDBCE17Q53654076-9E4466C2-9463-49BD-83D9-F50EB9966094Q54311354-4755367F-F1C9-4BE9-B4BC-FBA7AB7CA52BQ54344762-A89C71AA-3695-41BA-9E7E-16A8B98DE93B
P2860
Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@en
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@en
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@en
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ces for ventral hernia repair.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Comparison of cross-linked and ...... ices for ventral hernia repair
@en
P2093
Carmen N Rios
Charles E Butler
Kristin Turza Campbell
Mona V Jaffari
Nadja K Burns
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2010.04.024
P577
2010-07-14T00:00:00Z