Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
about
Test validity and performance validity: considerations in providing a framework for development of an ability-focused neuropsychological test batteryRates of Abnormally Low TOPF Word Reading Scores in Individuals Failing Versus Passing Performance Validity Testing.The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.Cumulative false positive rates given multiple performance validity tests: commentary on Davis and Millis (2014) and Larrabee (2014).American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.Reliable Digit Span: a systematic review and cross-validation study.The assessment of performance and self-report validity in persons claiming pain-related disability.Effort test failure: toward a predictive model.Validation of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status--effort index in a veteran sample.Expansion and re-examination of Digit Span effort indices on the WAIS-IV.Evaluation of embedded malingering indices in a non-litigating clinical sample using control, clinical, and derived groups.A case of malingering by proxy in a Social Security disability psychological consultative examination.Detection of response bias and noncredible performance in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) in a large sample of credible and noncredible patients referred for neuropsychological testing.Embedded performance validity testing in neuropsychological assessment: Potential clinical tools.Evaluating the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) in a Sample of Veterans Between the Ages of 18 to 64.Are verbal intelligence subtests and reading measures immune to non-credible effort?Embedded performance validity tests within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised.An index predictive of cognitive outcome in retired professional American Football players with a history of sports concussion.Embedded measures of performance validity using verbal fluency tests in a clinical sample.Embedded Measures of Performance Validity in the Rey Complex Figure Test in a Clinical Sample of Veterans.[Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists' Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals.Does True Neurocognitive Dysfunction Contribute to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2nd Edition-Restructured Form Cognitive Validity Scale Scores?The non-credible score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: is it better at predicting non-credible neuropsychological test performance than the RAVLT recognition score?Rates of False-Positive Classification Resulting From the Analysis of Additional Embedded Performance Validity Measures.Minimizing false positive error with multiple performance validity tests: response to Bilder, Sugar, and Hellemann (2014 this issue).Combining the test of memory malingering trial 1 with behavioral responses improves the detection of effort test failure.Victoria Symptom Validity Test: cutoff scores for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample.Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change.Poor performance validity predicts clinical characteristics and cognitive test performance of OEF/OIF/OND Veterans in a research setting.Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a measure of negative response bias.Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered.Concordance validity of PVTs in a sample of veterans referred for mild TBI.Embedded Performance Validity Measures with Postdeployment Veterans: Cross-Validation and Efficiency with Multiple Measures.Test of memory malingering: cutoff scores for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample.Evaluation of the MMPI-2-RF for Detecting Over-reported Symptoms in a Civil Forensic and Disability Setting.Concurrent validity of three forced-choice measures of symptom validity.[image omitted] Derivation of a composite measure of embedded symptom validity indices.Use of the WAIS-III picture completion subtest as an embedded measure of response bias.
P2860
Q26852502-67DE261D-2A02-4DB5-A91D-A931720971C7Q30276464-738460BD-2A30-4B82-A0E6-229A058F3D90Q34042671-F58291CD-6267-421D-B07C-A78C1B4FC26BQ34683633-AD7ADD83-CFEA-47D5-BEDE-00EC2DF7099AQ35091770-7C3C262F-90EA-476D-8EEC-46D54DABD5E8Q37593069-9B7F5A0C-D265-433B-AD51-367CF355551AQ37966730-0C183A6E-698F-4722-AAD8-ECEE516AFA1DQ38060179-9F23D5A7-DEB9-4CA1-A913-AF38C75EBA5BQ38400498-4278C330-9F88-473D-A604-D6F7E2FCBC14Q38403835-E5D4424A-ECB6-42CF-8902-26A8C371F74EQ38405730-7B8E6CF4-64E1-4D7E-A985-340B9088517DQ38407173-5D1D7F3F-4AC2-41FB-8FD6-D65EB459097DQ38409864-0B71BB21-85D1-45CA-AAB8-45B3508F5AF8Q38411170-84C0AF88-FA99-4B6A-AD04-AC8588886842Q38741384-9912BF92-523A-435C-92F8-1E968EEA34E2Q38764018-BF85E0DE-5759-4EB0-B873-7D292B28F289Q38885713-9271CC9B-BC2D-4522-967F-0BFC7A45EE7EQ39186440-A3126768-8884-4C48-BD78-D1F979881AE8Q39272666-9FC293F9-A8F3-41A5-A198-84D5664AE38CQ39981025-D3A26BA9-B371-4873-BB32-7E3A02EBF619Q40217356-B1E4A271-0BD6-4414-91AD-2CA548919527Q40314710-E5ECD080-57B2-4524-92BB-E48F4A070AE1Q40519055-4ED49CF7-C042-45DD-A78D-6D431690E5D8Q40861011-A80B7BD5-F8C4-4867-8A64-1820FA84BF3AQ41563437-A4349278-5D99-43BD-BDC7-22D55720C25CQ41588733-8ABABB26-8647-482D-BB03-1FA510EA035DQ41710660-8410A552-884A-4D48-8141-E19281A585A0Q43928357-EDE8293C-04E1-44ED-9323-921546EFC94DQ44301644-E90379AA-EA92-4882-87AE-95E515A94ECBQ44436432-D066C85F-4DB1-4D78-B626-D67E511F7AE1Q44563117-74A374C7-41FC-4FF3-90DF-7A1C532E38D4Q44593482-3C5A2CF8-3A64-41A2-99B8-C8A894D8A8C5Q45281595-20482FCB-CD68-4921-A07A-04D5CABC9BC6Q45326644-45CF2059-92D5-4EE9-9E04-73484766EDABQ45327950-3374A58D-96E7-4A84-8AA0-1B44B2B82181Q46021870-FDF2CDEB-0F45-484C-A9FB-39926913B4BFQ46059506-D7589BE1-ABD0-4CAF-B19F-4E74DC9F8E2DQ46102544-B55DD360-AF66-4FC9-9AB1-0CB32215BF7DQ46215478-493DF6CB-0822-4198-B3C2-3A1ACFEB0739Q46496051-7E55ED93-F657-47B0-AC97-2705799041F0
P2860
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@en
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@nl
type
label
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@en
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@nl
prefLabel
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@en
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure.
@en
P2093
Elizabeth A Ziegler
J Greg Serpa
Jody Buehler
Kyle B Boone
Tara L Victor
P304
P356
10.1080/13854040802232682
P577
2009-02-01T00:00:00Z