Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.
about
Effects on Text Simplification: Evaluation of Splitting Up Noun PhrasesReading grade level and completeness of freely available materials on thyroid nodules: there is work to be doneUser evaluation of the effects of a text simplification algorithm using term familiarity on perception, understanding, learning, and information retentionAssessing the effect of culturally specific audiovisual educational interventions on attaining self-management skills for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking patients: a randomized controlled trial.Development of an Internet Intervention to Address Behaviors Associated with Skin Cancer Risk among Young AdultsDifferences in perceived difficulty in print and online patient education materials.The PROactive innovative conceptual framework on physical activityAssessment of printed patient-educational materials for chronic kidney diseaseMoving Beyond Readability Metrics for Health-Related Text SimplificationPharmacy research on health literacy can contribute to national goals and health care system improvements.Consent information leaflets - readable or unreadable?Readability Formulas and User Perceptions of Electronic Health Records Difficulty: A Corpus Study.Readability and Coherence of Department/Ministry of Health HPV Information.Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?Online Tonsillectomy Resources: Are Parents Getting Consistent and Readable Recommendations?Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: A text content analysis.Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials.Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).Readability and Comprehensibility of Patient Information Leaflets for Antidiabetic Medications in Qatar.Health Literacy and Informed Consent Materials: Designed for Documentation, Not Comprehension of Health Research
P2860
Q28602892-5916D60A-35D0-4C15-8C89-9B293FCE5E50Q28650246-6A1EE938-204E-4DD0-B286-45513B0C97D4Q28682237-77B54BE8-EFED-45DE-9EFA-881E5E7451C0Q30151841-B56D7579-538B-4BB7-84BE-4DD5E807E334Q30277956-67308703-D51C-49A8-B4E3-4D301E3D022BQ34386681-BDFD6BE1-99DD-40F9-B509-6609F5230F2BQ34436896-55197F7C-1548-4BFA-A8FB-2298FC787513Q37244828-65E2AC2F-EF3D-412F-8966-19788A462BCBQ37300199-56E0632B-C189-4E95-9019-38ABEBC0A226Q37391916-ED64126C-3FF3-451C-BED3-EDD13238F760Q37420588-383B918B-B3FD-44DD-B05B-6C7F488E6993Q37707487-B328A6E6-84F9-4992-87FE-D076FB990D5EQ38389748-A83AD842-5040-4979-A56A-EE30DB40270BQ38735384-A519BD70-F94B-40B1-B89B-272FE66AD742Q40336848-BF9AD609-DA08-4266-9B24-6C627441DCE3Q42736479-7EAC797F-37EF-46C7-8E96-76FC0F77D3C6Q44419910-7414DC9E-1CE9-4953-A754-22D9B2BFE192Q46703839-7839250B-ADD7-4212-9411-9F362EBC5BA4Q47237217-FDBB29D1-EB03-4668-A601-E77407B0467DQ47358472-6690AA15-441E-4983-83BB-89D98C784618Q47913998-C6D6F679-B5D3-4BA2-B376-3AB5931BCD26Q48151592-C1FAC162-6915-4CF6-B378-21B52809D648Q50017776-D2C0CBBE-BFF7-48F9-B18F-F2635BAB4186Q50128578-52CD29DB-9BAE-46BC-A050-F406AC0233C9Q55340061-639E613C-2DCB-43E1-9BA3-400F30407221Q56763328-E786D9A5-61AA-43E8-854C-FCDA0716FFC0
P2860
Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@en
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@nl
type
label
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@en
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@en
Assessing readability formula ...... results, and recommendations.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Assessing readability formula ...... , results, and recommendations
@en
P2093
Frances K Wen
Lih-Wern Wang
Michael R Schmitt
P304
P356
10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2012.05.009
P577
2012-07-25T00:00:00Z