Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
about
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA.ART Strategy for Treatment of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Isn't It Better to Forget?Two-year outcome after recurrent first trimester miscarriages: prognostic value of the past obstetric history.Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
P2860
Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@en
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@nl
type
label
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@en
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@nl
prefLabel
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@en
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ...... ined recurrent pregnancy loss.
@en
P2093
Gayathree Murugappan
Mika S Ohno
Ruth B Lathi
P304
P356
10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2015.02.012
P407
P577
2015-03-13T00:00:00Z