Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial.

about

Investigator-initiated studies: Challenges and solutions Analysis of clinical benefit, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm

P2860

Q57488982-D41B6207-D6EE-4315-93B1-EA14695B3FA2 Q58788491-A79C9A22-10C3-44FF-86F2-24069C5687E1

P2860

Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47144942

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@en

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@nl

type

Item

label

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@en

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@nl

prefLabel

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@en

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@nl

P1476

Comparative clinical effective ...... the IMPROVE randomised trial.

@en

P2093

IMPROVE Trial Investigators

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report

Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data.

Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years.

Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial.

An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials

The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population

Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial

Individual-patient meta-analysis of three randomized trials comparing endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

P304

j4859

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.J4859

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P478

359

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2017-11-14T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29138135

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5682594

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial.

about

P2860

P2860

Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P577

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P577

P698

P932