Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

about

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47222900

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@en

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@nl

type

Item

label

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@en

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@nl

prefLabel

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@en

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@nl

P1476

Between evidence and commerce - the case of sufentanil sublingual tablet systems.

@en

P2093

C Bantel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H C Laycock

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review

Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study

Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review

Of sophists and spin-doctors: industry-sponsored ghostwriting and the crisis of academic medicine.

HARLOT plc: an amalgamation of the world's two oldest professions.

Understanding bias--the case for careful study.

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system vs. intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain control: a randomized, active-comparator trial.

Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents.

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system for the management of postoperative pain following open abdominal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?

P304

143-147

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

editorial

P356

10.1111/ANAE.14037

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2017-12-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29219168

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5814728

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string