A Bias in the Evaluation of Bias Comparing Randomized Trials with Nonexperimental Studies.

about

When and how can real world data analyses substitute for randomized controlled trials?

P2860

Q38610846-1CA88495-EDB7-459D-8185-0AF6B52CF89A

P2860

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bias Comparing Randomized Trials with Nonexperimental Studies.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47369874

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@en

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@nl

type

Item

label

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@en

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@nl

prefLabel

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@en

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@nl

P1476

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bi ...... with Nonexperimental Studies.

@en

P2093

Jessica M Franklin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kenneth J Rothman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Krista F Huybrechts

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sara Dejene

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Shirley V Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Why most published research findings are false

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care

Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement

Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.

Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey

The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges.

Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain.

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1515/EM-2016-0018

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Martin Kulldorff

P577

2017-04-22T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29204330

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

bias

P932

5710821

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bias Comparing Randomized Trials with Nonexperimental Studies.

about

P2860

P2860

A Bias in the Evaluation of Bias Comparing Randomized Trials with Nonexperimental Studies.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921

P932