Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
about
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trialImmediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraceptionImmediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraceptionCurrent sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternativesCONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsReporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: reviewRandomized controlled trials - a matter of designSample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: reviewImportant statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review articleStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaborationExplanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary ExtensionPublication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample sizeTailoring Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Subtypes of Voice-Hearing.Delta inflation: a bias in the design of randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine.Using Observational Data to Estimate the Effect of Hand Washing and Clean Delivery Kit Use by Birth Attendants on Maternal Deaths after Home Deliveries in Rural Bangladesh, India and Nepal.Sample size in studies on diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology: a literature survey.Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research.The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretationWhat differences are detected by superiority trials or ruled out by noninferiority trials? A cross-sectional study on a random sample of two-hundred two-arms parallel group randomized clinical trials.Randomized clinical trials in stroke research.CT densitovolumetry in children with obliterative bronchiolitis: correlation with clinical scores and pulmonary function test results.The effectiveness of emergency nurse practitioner service in the management of patients presenting to rural hospitals with chest pain: a multisite prospective longitudinal nested cohort study.The spinal posture of computing adolescents in a real-life setting.Are surgical trials with negative results being interpreted correctly?Behavioral counseling to prevent childhood obesity--study protocol of a pragmatic trial in maternity and child health care.Five questions that need answering when considering the design of clinical trials.Azathioprine versus beta interferons for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trialEfficacy and safety of Suanzaoren decoction for primary insomnia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsPragmatic controlled trial to prevent childhood obesity in maternity and child health care clinics: pregnancy and infant weight outcomes (the VACOPP Study).The use and abuse of multiple outcomes in randomized controlled depression trials.Lifestyle intervention development study to improve physical function in older adults with cancer: outcomes from Project LEADTraining Cameroonian researchers on pragmatic knowledge translation trials: a workshop reportStrengthening Interactions between Statisticians and Collaborators: Objectives and Sample SizesOutcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.When is waiver of consent appropriate in a neonatal clinical trial?
P2860
Q21563449-A6C4BE73-CD85-42B8-AC6E-D754E91E5C76Q22000129-52C2ADDA-B1F3-4D17-8D56-A9A1401B240AQ24202496-98A6B2F5-B717-4736-A4BB-587085375590Q24242950-AE762B93-D6BA-44A3-9432-18008686AB4BQ24288939-6610631F-C275-4DAF-8A0A-5F775D382C1AQ24614627-1D343E90-3086-40FA-A0D6-8153213192C2Q24645630-3BDBCD10-4D27-487C-A80C-8A69E88710F1Q26746217-7FA2874A-03E5-49F7-BF93-244AAA5A1893Q26827210-85865551-735A-4F5D-B2B6-B7CBA72E3C08Q26997804-88AEB0F4-144D-4F87-8501-CF09C368518DQ28222847-6645F1B6-3C5C-42C6-8486-D6056B286245Q28595548-C5E84E31-E65C-4BE9-8453-5B294E2DFFD9Q28655986-76174B16-6418-4ADE-AA2E-77CB538C7592Q30394450-A5720B39-82CB-47B2-BBE8-B2B6E341444BQ30435820-7888E5B8-D310-4B49-84F2-9A8091A29C3BQ30988688-493DE09F-9467-48BB-8F52-869B79B4CDE2Q33273828-0F847A99-1846-4828-B779-7EAC4CFCC1E7Q33389750-82B88B37-E035-434A-9E46-2E776F083657Q33437253-AF6A5F19-BA85-4307-A1E2-C2724EDFB303Q33581331-6BCF7B0A-DD78-4DD6-8C6C-D850BBC0E58CQ33719931-721F1CEA-8D43-4D82-A72E-ABC45DC8D925Q33725049-91A8C58F-2065-4750-AA05-9FDE1B025704Q33824293-EB13F49B-B312-4642-8716-7BA3EDA71653Q33846251-1C763930-2ECE-4014-BC9F-DD6C6D726E90Q33890078-65E52434-DC68-425C-89DB-C871AE08665DQ34193301-D0FB7681-2D1B-45F6-B818-1E576F744778Q34324730-95CC7CDE-50A8-46E7-9887-07FC9A6F2E17Q34468919-33CD5546-DA51-4835-8E38-14396AD14450Q34526979-C251AE57-B596-4279-8F0C-E104C35065CBQ34556285-110C55C3-AC70-4C7B-AF39-A5379388A48AQ34729019-10EF1D91-75A9-4C93-8F07-E0DEB80B8F3BQ34766181-44B93BBC-71DE-496F-95EC-5479565D97EBQ34936107-666C4C83-FC02-41BF-8665-E8EB4FEA00A4Q35204987-A5C8FF9A-B0F1-439B-AA7F-456DBBAAFBB7Q35545901-64DAAFAA-25F6-4C85-A97B-D0EC546360A5Q35638261-D0917F5B-BDE4-4964-8E85-F28F12048554Q35690966-B80DBA47-AF43-417D-8BB4-2293D25D99AAQ35845314-989BD652-A872-480C-8A23-872B47B51B5EQ35845397-2C8D3AC3-168E-45D1-A792-A5D1B926842BQ35943178-FB8614DB-AB1A-487A-BA59-825034D990F6
P2860
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@en
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@nl
type
label
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@en
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@nl
prefLabel
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@en
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical.
@en
P2093
Kenneth F Schulz
P304
P356
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61034-3
P407
P50
P577
2005-04-01T00:00:00Z