A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.
about
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adultsStretch for the treatment and prevention of contracturesRehabilitation for ankle fractures in adultsValidity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrumentUsing linked data to calculate summary measures of population health: Health-adjusted life expectancy of people with Diabetes MellitusDo English and Chinese EQ-5D versions demonstrate measurement equivalence? An exploratory studyHealth-related quality of life in patients waiting for major joint replacement. A comparison between patients and population controlsProtocol for the RT Prepare Trial: a multiple-baseline study of radiation therapists delivering education and support to women with breast cancer who are referred for radiotherapy.Is there an alternative to quality-adjusted life years for supporting healthcare decision making?Trial for the Prevention of Depression (TriPoD) in final-year secondary students: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.Effectiveness of joint mobilisation after cast immobilisation for ankle fracture: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial [ACTRN012605000143628].Cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in acute liver failure.Effect of neck strength training on health-related quality of life in females with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study.EXACT: exercise or advice after ankle fracture. Design of a randomised controlled trial.Longitudinal Evaluation of Transition Services ("LETS Study"): protocol for outcome evaluation.Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes StHealth-related quality of life and strain in caregivers of Australians with Parkinson's disease: an observational studyProbiotics to improve outcomes of colic in the community: protocol for the Baby Biotics randomised controlled trial.The effectiveness and safety of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A double blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study.Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.Comparison between the disease-specific Airways Questionnaire 20 and the generic 15D instruments in COPD.Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-makingBayesian predictors of very poor health related quality of life and mortality in patients with COPD.Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease.Parsimonious and efficient assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis research: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrumentCost-utility of routine cataract surgery.The generic 15D instrument is valid and feasible for measuring health related quality of life in Parkinson's disease.A comparison of health utility measures for the evaluation of multiple sclerosis treatmentsEfficacy of physiotherapy management of knee joint osteoarthritis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trialWhy do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and 'micro-utility' effectsDoes Future Diabetes Risk Impair Current Quality of Life? A Cross-Sectional Study of Health-Related Quality of Life in Relation to the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC).Construction of the descriptive system for the Assessment of Quality of Life AQoL-6D utility instrument.Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study.Cost-effectiveness analysis for a tele-based health coaching program for chronic disease in primary care.A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation.Protocol for economic evaluation alongside the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised controlled trial.The health-related quality of life burden of co-morbid cardiovascular disease and major depressive disorder in Australia: findings from a population-based, cross-sectional study.Long-term health-related quality of life of surgically treated pituitary adenoma patients: a descriptive study.Quality of life utility values for hereditary haemochromatosis in Australia.
P2860
Q24203008-511197A0-641B-4DAD-B398-98F770BAA4D1Q24235508-ED82E4AA-ABA7-4FE8-8445-1050A8607120Q24242279-2BED2E40-3FEC-4733-802E-D4D28601727AQ24603412-057F18F6-E6A7-4DAA-820C-942D20791E80Q24797479-E19118C4-DE44-49D8-8CE7-43F2FFCDB5BFQ24798201-444275C5-BAEF-4DEC-A6F4-C8AC02820936Q25256572-0B196BAB-3814-4F01-A1A5-C170E11FADEAQ30208952-D52FCACF-9FB7-4614-9F41-64D17242A04CQ30387584-C884554E-E960-4226-9158-12A9EABDC5C3Q30667872-918C337D-5413-4941-8A9C-82B88E4D8683Q33244908-04C5C5AC-7A0A-4879-9ADF-53364ED78360Q33844163-B45342F8-2123-4396-B917-18CBA9F375C3Q33878712-969B0708-6951-495D-BAC5-0AB8BB560837Q33949937-F278E4C7-D1AB-42CD-B6F3-5EF162BD95DFQ34269488-3D318290-6E7E-4EAF-87EC-926C69E93E80Q34275175-28A72120-D821-4BA3-9F1C-9258190F9F00Q34340178-6C86C928-46FC-4665-9ABF-90CF0525B09CQ34396355-0B4FD191-22D1-4805-8C92-6646BC324273Q34417191-47613B80-7A09-4EB8-9543-8BABF1364092Q34423176-AAC5CDC6-8FD2-4F15-9743-3F8CF6DDC825Q34540778-8147E1C0-7391-499C-9753-C23DE4F29AD1Q34614168-0FAF9B70-983C-4EF1-848C-5C1725F5181BQ34621660-DBED56A4-5EF5-40B3-BA9F-1B4CF9F5AF35Q34641292-554B0C3B-CC83-4D5C-A58E-F989B06E7CBDQ34667255-EAA6AA5C-964C-4210-A41A-60F4AE45C83DQ34972957-649CB0C2-D08A-4EAF-A884-39809021217AQ35070384-5B429B23-7F7F-47E3-9748-2B2E1EA09254Q35482058-C36080F6-D0CD-4D96-8132-AEFBC33FEB08Q35483470-986DBD08-933F-401F-9F26-04E7CA27B4B9Q35555685-46775941-4416-4967-8769-B201D41C0BC2Q35825864-D168285B-DD88-42F8-B379-FE2C2632D61EQ35913145-A7450609-E9DD-4849-8A04-BBA75FD057F6Q35950711-F91002E3-D774-4ECD-98C0-927F7E0EDE48Q36098135-579D4E6A-8EA7-4C3B-83B1-AB8981548EC7Q36281726-511C8270-1A68-4152-BCA5-2EAE7F9251EBQ36503744-E1031432-9922-4019-A37E-DC5EBA691DB4Q36532638-ADF70AA1-743D-4AA8-AA90-951370918F26Q36542628-ED0CCCBA-C1EF-4A4A-8CC5-1E2A57F276E3Q36546547-668B795F-FB5B-4EBF-AA4D-AE823DE6BCECQ36629254-CF96F282-47F5-47D5-A4FF-C0EC4FDEBAD1
P2860
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年学术文章
@wuu
2001年学术文章
@zh-cn
2001年学术文章
@zh-hans
2001年学术文章
@zh-my
2001年学术文章
@zh-sg
2001年學術文章
@yue
2001年學術文章
@zh
2001年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of the Assessment ...... r generic utility instruments.
@en
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life
@nl
type
label
A comparison of the Assessment ...... r generic utility instruments.
@en
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of the Assessment ...... r generic utility instruments.
@en
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
A comparison of the Assessment ...... r generic utility instruments.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.3109/07853890109002090
P407
P577
2001-07-01T00:00:00Z