Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
about
Recent advances in understanding and treating acute respiratory distress syndromeDriving-pressure-independent protective effects of open lung approach against experimental acute respiratory distress syndromeShould we titrate ventilation based on driving pressure? Maybe not in the way we would expectMechanical ventilation and respiratory monitoring during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory support
P2860
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@en
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@nl
type
label
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@en
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@en
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP ...... atic Review and Meta-Analysis.
@en
P2093
B Taylor Thompson
Carol L Hodgson
Daniel S Talmor
Elizabeth Uleryk
Hannah Wunsch
Lorenzo Del Sorbo
Maureen O Meade
Neill K J Adhikari
Roy G Brower
P2860
P304
P356
10.1513/ANNALSATS.201704-338OT
P433
Supplement_4
P577
2017-10-18T00:00:00Z