Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
about
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective EnterpriseMass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.Randomly auditing research labs could be an affordable way to improve research quality: A simulation study.Collaboration in orthodontic clinical trials: prevalence and association with sample size and funding.
P2860
Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence?
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@en
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@nl
type
label
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@en
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@nl
prefLabel
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@en
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Academic criteria for appointm ...... esearch: where's the evidence?
@en
P2093
Steven N Goodman
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/ECI.12612
P577
2016-02-29T00:00:00Z