Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
about
Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.Bidirectional modulation of neuronal responses by depolarizing GABAergic inputs.Coding of temporally varying signals in networks of spiking neurons with global delayed feedback.Distribution of interspike intervals estimated from multiple spike trains observed in a short time window.Relation between single neuron and population spiking statistics and effects on network activity.Dynamical Mechanism of Hyperpolarization-Activated Non-specific Cation Current Induced Resonance and Spike-Timing Precision in a Neuronal Model.
P2860
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@en
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@nl
type
label
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@en
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@nl
prefLabel
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@en
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense?
@en
P2093
Naoki Masuda
P2860
P304
P356
10.1162/089976603321780308
P577
2003-06-01T00:00:00Z