An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
about
In vivo comparison between the effects of chemically modified hydrophilic and anodically oxidized titanium surfaces on initial bone healing.Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation.The rabbit as experimental model for research in implant dentistry and related tissue regeneration.Health, Maintenance, and Recovery of Soft Tissues around Implants.Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.Early bone apposition to hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium implant surfaces: a histologic and histomorphometric study in minipigs.Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.Implants with an Oxidized Surface Placed Predominately in Soft Bone Quality and Subjected to Immediate Occlusal Loading: Results from an 11-Year Clinical Follow-Up.Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.Influence of the implant design on osseointegration and crestal bone resorption of immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.Accelerated Healing Period with Hydrophilic Implant Placed in Sheep Tibia.Damping Factor as a Diagnostic Parameter for Assessment of Osseointegration during the Dental Implant Healing Process: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.Histomorphometric and histologic evaluation of titanium-zirconium (aTiZr) implants with anodized surfaces.Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.Effects of aspirin-loaded graphene oxide coating of a titanium surface on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cellsInterfacial biomechanical properties of a dual acid-etched versus a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface: an experimental study in Beagles
P2860
Q35679485-6A43D8E8-05F5-47C5-A1E8-95FAB5EB8088Q37714704-BBF77942-8B0C-452B-8176-4BB91706460DQ38101598-4CF79BE7-DD77-4A02-A4CE-6B85D6E29F3BQ38420853-6622F064-C174-43BD-AE34-970440B96E57Q39582627-E52D7F8C-C0F6-435E-8C5C-12C6DCD70ECBQ43637160-819431E1-4FD6-4A05-A3A5-6540C1408192Q43995773-DD742651-68CD-4C75-9752-ABD50B57B0C2Q46685072-83EB1022-1668-4FB0-8175-99EE84F78FC2Q46848510-800AC1BC-02AB-45AD-98E7-7F6273CA4125Q48325253-39B44DDD-BFBE-4CF0-A83F-1B3E93AFEA91Q50033826-39BFE594-A7F9-46D7-89EF-46A70ADCAF4BQ51290138-B3363A52-EBF9-49E1-B3E7-87EAC859E57BQ51447897-9F7B39BB-C701-4D70-96E0-6718C99214BBQ51670410-49BBC5D5-F984-45ED-8769-164127344206Q57477119-9E835513-37DC-43DF-B8AC-826BBAD7E6B1Q58692040-08D53A12-2432-4B26-826F-ED29E06829CA
P2860
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@en
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@nl
type
label
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@en
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@nl
prefLabel
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@en
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@nl
P2860
P1476
An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
@en
P2093
Jan Gottlow
Sargon Barkarmo
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1708-8208.2012.00439.X
P478
14 Suppl 1
P577
2012-04-05T00:00:00Z