Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.

about

Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47943543

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年学术文章

@wuu

2016年学术文章

@zh

2016年学术文章

@zh-cn

2016年学术文章

@zh-hans

2016年学术文章

@zh-my

2016年学术文章

@zh-sg

2016年學術文章

@yue

2016年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@en

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@nl

type

Item

label

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@en

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@nl

prefLabel

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@en

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... patients: A randomized trial.

@nl

P1476

Ultrathin versus pediatric ins ...... e patients: A randomized trial

@en

P2093

Kazutomo Togashi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Noriyuki Isohata

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Shungo Endo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Evolving techniques in colonoscopy.

Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope.

Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon.

Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.

Routine colonoscopy with a standard gastroscope. A randomized comparative trial in a western population.

A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.

Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination.

A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.

P304

168-174

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/DEN.12761

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

David G. Hewett

Kenichi Utano

Daiki Nemoto

P577

2016-12-02T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27859645

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

colonoscopy