A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
about
Cerebellar brain inhibition in the target and surround muscles during voluntary tonic activation.Effects of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortex excitability and motor function.Physical activity modulates corticospinal excitability of the lower limb in young and old adults.Non-linear changes to corticospinal excitability induced with increasing intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation.Development of cortical motor circuits between childhood and adulthood: A navigated TMS-HdEEG study.The influence of motor function on processing speed in preterm and term-born children.Reduced Cortical Excitability, Neuroplasticity, and Salivary Cortisol in 11-13-Year-Old Children Born to Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
P2860
Q36813480-89A47B14-9766-41F3-9392-C26E300F0660Q39033857-F8DBB6E4-9D39-49BA-BA19-85714C00760BQ48155951-0DC2B1EE-30F5-49BA-BD04-D8B2F44A64BAQ48181547-DB46AA12-D84A-4B0B-8DA9-EE73E79CF9FEQ48218454-9B8FAC35-A56F-4E2A-BCDD-9095836E9CA2Q50785117-3A36A0E9-F915-4962-9B7C-1C914354ADC2Q55335986-C9D83174-BCE3-4119-BFFF-64142643D812
P2860
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@en
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@en
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@en
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential.
@nl
P2093
P1476
A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential
@en
P2093
Ann-Maree Vallence
John G Semmler
Julia B Pitcher
Luke A Schneider
Michael C Ridding
Michelle N McDonnell
Sebastian H Doeltgen
P304
P356
10.1016/J.CLINPH.2015.02.011
P577
2015-02-28T00:00:00Z