The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
about
Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention.On the precision of goal-directed attentional selectionGoal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.Gaze in Visual Search Is Guided More Efficiently by Positive Cues than by Negative CuesEvidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.Inhibition drives early feature-based attention.The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection.The attentional boost effect really is a boost: evidence from a new baseline.Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.Distractor effect at initial stages of recognition depends on visual image properties.The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.Knowing and avoiding: the influence of distractor awareness on oculomotor capture.Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.Ironic capture: top-down expectations exacerbate distraction in visual search.Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.Whatever You Do, Don't Look at the . . .: Evaluating Guidance by an Exclusionary Attentional Template.Out of sight, out of mind: Matching bias underlies confirmatory visual search.Expect the unexpected: a paradoxical effect of cue validity on the orienting of attention.Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
P2860
Q33841140-32A294DA-4C8F-4BD6-8103-E0CCBC7FD31DQ35049799-AE880D9D-E890-4C6B-A999-21F4AABA8E0DQ35118940-771445A1-7656-4F88-AA20-9407C55E16CDQ35881842-FC14E8C0-D91C-4C02-B55B-23FDF8F1B750Q36101639-16E85C0A-598D-41BB-8B3A-8059BA7943BEQ37624103-7E0F85E6-06B2-44D9-9488-EA797A67935CQ38643525-65368EFB-223F-4C60-A4CA-2EA5B0003A37Q43857816-7926F36F-CA89-47CD-A65A-FB54BCE0F6F8Q44746695-5488DA6A-6214-413C-821F-0E8C3E7932BCQ45122859-42CF34FF-F0BF-474E-A6CC-1F33838C0CEAQ46199760-8F1BD637-39CE-4C96-B1A3-E4D3FA0E91EFQ46321657-D7259F9A-0CE2-4AC5-9706-A065FF07440AQ47598008-67C372FE-8DC3-47B2-AC41-C3E11E6F81ACQ47920577-302BEB84-41B8-426E-843A-992865E06D2BQ48336333-98475EED-C1A2-4702-BCED-DEB284380949Q48893230-136E9BB8-552F-4E02-94A3-71625399C98AQ50073073-7DAF9378-FC54-4067-B511-EE76BDACFB53Q50220836-3F12C5A6-F753-424D-9145-039BC83E9AA8Q50502290-68244FCE-3081-41F2-9E53-BA6C91919DF2Q50509498-E6557B71-757E-4AD6-883E-DD1072E5A6FCQ53145053-FED7F92C-343D-4598-98B5-4CB399C201DB
P2860
The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@en
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@nl
type
label
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@en
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@nl
prefLabel
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@en
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@nl
P2860
P1476
The ignoring paradox: cueing d ...... bition of to-be-ignored items.
@en
P2093
Howard E Egeth
Jeff Moher
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.3758/S13414-012-0358-0
P577
2012-11-01T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1040741891