Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
about
American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests.Traumatic brain injury: guidance in a forensic context from outcome, dose-response, and response bias research.Assessing sub-optimal performance with the Test of Memory Malingering in Spanish speaking patients with TBI.Symptom validity test performance in U.S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI.Embedded effort indicators on the California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II): an attempted cross-validation.Differentiating Factitious from Malingered Symptomatology: the Development of a Psychometric Approach.Intent to fail: significance testing of forced choice test results.The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance.The value of embedded measures in detecting suboptimal effort in children: an investigation into the WISC-IV Digit Span and CMS Verbal Memory subtests.Efficacy of test of memory malingering Trial 1, Trial 2, the Retention Trial, and the Albany Consistency Index in a criterion group forensic neuropsychological sample.The Albany Consistency Index for the Test of Memory Malingering.Detection of insufficient effort using the advanced clinical solutions for the Wechsler Memory Scale, fourth edition.
P2860
Q37593069-F23F1A68-E15C-451A-8AE6-FAD5EBE6F26BQ38115625-D1B5A2C6-AC75-48C2-94FB-E54D3369CEB5Q38135771-9CA04F48-2E07-4951-AB5A-D64B6354FBB3Q39617855-FB05D2EF-511A-4427-88C8-453CA03FD648Q45331209-55A8CD19-1585-43EF-840F-4B5B144F6CBFQ46337812-B8A7A862-A85E-4641-9E0C-C8E91D060C50Q47160343-030177DC-3C15-4FE8-8F80-6E308E31E8E1Q47711436-3832F50C-15EB-4B51-87D7-C7F025323122Q48690072-4EF43892-3491-4078-8F5C-B5108B22B2C4Q50709267-0ED57C1C-4E1A-462E-A920-5F7663F8E13CQ50779504-7B351369-1D76-4A6A-A010-C6CD05B94181Q50981772-AAF575BE-B8FA-49E2-AA2F-583D3EE668FEQ51022914-A88204C9-7D5D-4720-AC2E-4EE7074577F0
P2860
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@en
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@nl
type
label
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@en
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@nl
prefLabel
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@en
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests.
@en
P2093
Kevin J Bianchini
Kevin W Greve
Laurence M Binder
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/13854040802232690
P577
2009-02-16T00:00:00Z