Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer.
about
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologyCleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologyCleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conceptionCleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologyCumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program.Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.Improving fertilization rate in ICSI cycles by adding myoinositol to the semen preparation procedures: a prospective, bicentric, randomized trial on sibling oocytesRelationship between meiotic spindle characteristics in human oocytes and the timing of the first zygotic cleavage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Comparison of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer to elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer in human IVF-ETSingle embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal.Supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation: a key prognostic indicator for patients opting for an elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT).Comparison of pregnancy, implantation, and multiple gestation rates for day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfers.Selection of embryos for day-3 transfer at the pronuclear-stage and pronuclear-stage cryopreservation results in high delivery rates in fresh and frozen cycles.Blastomere cytoplasmic granularity is unrelated to developmental potential of day 3 human embryos.Embryo cryopreservation: evidence for practice.Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte studyAge as A Predictor of Embryo Quality Regardless of The Quantitative Ovarian Response.Comparison of the transfer of equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos after repeated failure of in vitro fertilization cyclesElective Single Embryo Transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines.Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes.Building a model to increase live birth rate through patient-specific optimization of embryo transfer day.Hydroxypropyl cellulose supplementation in vitrification solutions: a prospective study with donor oocytes.Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study.Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes with Freshly Ejaculated Sperms and Testicular or Epididymal Sperm Extraction in Patients with Idiopathic CryptozoospermiaSingle Blastocyst Transfer: The Key to Reduce Multiple Pregnancy Rates Without Compromising the Live Birth Rate.Low mitochondrial DNA and ATP contents contribute to the absence of birefringent spindle imaged with PolScope in in vitro matured human oocytes.Pronuclear pattern does not predict morphokinetics behavior in human embryos.Pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and embryo quality: Clues for single blastocyst transfer from double blastocyst transfer in an unselected population.Traditional intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides equivalent outcomes compared with human zona pellucida-bound selected sperm injection.Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy.Randomized study comparing day 2 versus day 3 elective transfer of two good-quality embryos.
P2860
Q24202151-EFDDAF2B-3822-44BB-A1C0-59C32F256911Q24243652-38897E0D-8E7B-4242-9AA0-C67E7F2BEAD4Q24245494-1E9B1B15-CC9B-4B40-8473-79220061F9A6Q26471376-FD5A65D8-B32D-403F-8CD8-B6DEA81D4025Q33787113-03B59092-7C11-4475-B5C9-38E3EE2DB41EQ35160862-7B83D6A8-78CF-403A-A76A-99FFBE618592Q35186908-A456E7AB-0BFF-4E62-B9AD-C22759A0802EQ35573327-9CE5AD27-B11D-4B7B-AF1C-6A76705B61FAQ35767738-5F21DC29-83CD-414D-A189-7EB20D435D45Q35932775-A0DEBE6D-88A8-45F6-B215-7032ECCE387BQ36198811-8EFC570C-E50F-49E8-AF45-475FDD7D5D58Q36269293-482932C0-984A-4D9F-8C30-7713DDB49A38Q36269362-0A680A6F-CF82-4DDD-8EA0-4B6E0E681F1FQ36269793-D8B7EFD7-A8A1-49FD-B3CC-6AEDF8BB5369Q37299882-1DDC4DE9-BC57-47CA-9752-8A97D97D5537Q37375177-02722B79-BEAC-4CB4-BB46-09620D2603F4Q37479046-CAE63B09-5587-4864-839D-2F5CDAF65B6CQ37561752-F9810AEA-C279-4675-8527-A0093DDB946AQ37625646-94092179-DEF2-464A-9714-BC4624A8EFE1Q38590592-7A45920E-E8DF-4E37-95AC-876E6D8C8851Q38978692-4D110413-A0AA-468C-B347-A6DE2D2BF93CQ40587061-E3997D0A-4551-41E9-8027-45B808092DE7Q41597734-480807EE-B8BE-4190-9E5C-B8B9DB3C16CAQ41606292-92807829-B241-450B-9F50-AA267D1ABDE3Q41844660-EE49C8D5-6507-469C-B48F-C6E1EC8B1FC3Q47162695-599C94AE-1E16-4FD6-BC65-7C9C3CFDFAD6Q48794607-A94995A8-8891-4385-9F7B-C12E02449639Q50072749-8E08391A-6ACA-4DB7-899F-F2E03EE56879Q52716205-DB938127-192A-4A12-950E-D6CE0D5E600DQ53107883-C7568FA5-D552-41ED-8F44-5148F5590980Q53176760-CDD32AD7-CA4C-48CF-B3C5-A36769127121Q55359684-AD6A4DC4-DF55-4124-8895-191DD1126613
P2860
Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年学术文章
@wuu
2002年学术文章
@zh
2002年学术文章
@zh-cn
2002年学术文章
@zh-hans
2002年学术文章
@zh-my
2002年学术文章
@zh-sg
2002年學術文章
@yue
2002年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@en
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@nl
type
label
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@en
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@nl
prefLabel
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@en
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Day 3 embryo transfer with com ...... ith day 5 blastocyst transfer.
@en
P2093
Ermanno Greco
Filippo Ubaldi
Francisco Martinez
Jan Tesarik
Laura Rienzi
Marcello Iacobelli
Maria Giulia Minasi
Susanna Ferrero
P304
P356
10.1093/HUMREP/17.7.1852
P407
P577
2002-07-01T00:00:00Z