The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study.
about
Effective Communication During an Influenza Pandemic: The Value of Using a Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication FrameworkWorldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in TurkeyThe anthrax vaccine and research: reactions from postal workers and public health professionalsRisk communication concerning welding fumes for the primary preventive care of welding apprentices in southern BrazilEnvironmental Research Translation: enhancing interactions with communities at contaminated sitesMeasuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI)Crisis communication: an inequalities perspective on the 2010 Boston water crisis.Developing a bioterrorism preparedness campaign for veterans: Using focus groups to inform materials development.Trust during the early stages of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.Lessons from the pandemic: the need for new tools for risk and outbreak communication.Management of natural and bioterrorism induced pandemics.Risk communication during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: stakeholder experiences from eight European countries.Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under Emergency Use Authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.Predictors of influenza vaccine uptake during the 2009/10 influenza A H1N1v ('swine flu') pandemic: Results from five national surveys in the United Kingdom.The vagaries of public support for government actions in case of a pandemic.Growing pains: How risk perception and risk communication research can help to manage the challenges of global population growth.Public support for policies to reduce risk after Hurricane Sandy.Acceptable Risk Analysis for Abrupt Environmental Pollution Accidents in Zhangjiakou City, ChinaUnquestioned answers or unanswered questions: beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication.Perceptional and socio-demographic factors associated with household drinking water management strategies in rural Puerto RicoCapturing Community Context of Human Response to Forest Disturbance by Insects: A Multi-Method AssessmentPerceptions of environmental health risks among residents in the "Toxic Doughnut": opportunities for risk screening and community mobilizationRisk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban settingCurrent State and Problems of Radiation Risk Communication: Based on the Results of a 2012 Whole Village Survey.A cross-hazard analysis of terse message retransmission on Twitter.Public Perception of Uncertainties Within Climate Change Science.Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996-2005.Pig producer perspectives on the use of meat inspection as an animal health and welfare diagnostic tool in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.The effect of social trust on citizens’ health risk perception in the context of a petrochemical industrial complex.Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation PlanCommunicating the balance sheet in breast cancer screening.Reputation, relationships, risk communication, and the role of trust in the prevention and control of communicable disease: a review.Factors related to furniture anchoring: a method for reducing harm during earthquakes.Clinical credibility and trustworthiness are key characteristics used to identify colleagues from whom to seek information.Effective environmental risk communication-Success stories or urban legends?Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster.Improving the production of applied health research findings: insights from a qualitative study of operational researchAn empirical study of the toxic capsule crisis in China: risk perceptions and behavioral responses.How people perceive and will cope with risks from the diffusion of ubiquitous information and communication technologies.Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.
P2860
Q23021109-2D82058D-5DF7-4D3A-8AB2-F3B4A33F7674Q28294123-C8098672-F078-48F1-BF84-A7D8D864D301Q28384154-FC63E2EB-5E0C-4361-87D5-A670EEE9009EQ28386658-C71B8224-7829-4A7E-BACF-637F70781F8FQ28395372-FE86387D-727F-48EF-A2D6-E0D1230B973FQ28611094-D335F796-D0F2-4227-A210-977582BE803CQ30223773-E4B45B6E-885E-49BC-B690-16DEE87C2D14Q30230518-E5C5AD07-AC02-4BFB-96B1-F69429EF210FQ30354402-2D83DD18-FCB8-481B-99E5-E19F91FFD081Q30354808-775A8C4F-B95C-42A1-A32B-A9E4E87A9544Q30364483-0479B381-0C1C-4431-B873-B63F753EFCA0Q30373769-C7B15D58-6F93-41C5-ACDE-4302013D0DCEQ30381013-2F366719-E9FD-4791-A725-800B0D3F26C1Q30383458-EBF4A008-B5FA-47CC-A0D2-AD4517DA0C3CQ30397041-192C4B5F-A97E-4F06-90CC-6961892B8946Q30769636-9A303BCF-FB34-4E90-9940-CFDABFAD0F85Q30795234-CFDBAFBC-CCCF-4060-BF46-B5E69E7BB9A9Q33616458-F877CDD8-20F8-436A-A9D6-A7F9A4A1F136Q34156112-D3355D84-837B-4200-A61D-F9204F15A6C0Q35106017-EE9CC3DB-DA64-42AB-BB67-D1AB3292D362Q35621747-CB545365-9F43-44E6-AE89-59FCF2D5B2EEQ35865111-97B6F10A-4504-419C-8EFF-12AE142E7589Q36273934-CA426CF6-8243-48CE-BD63-B1BD3EFFCB80Q36339203-92DC3208-87C5-48F8-A53B-D7B38A97FDB3Q36354997-C84A9532-5C19-426C-8E74-D1B766138B6FQ36355297-8B86B1AA-58BF-4F27-BA32-6CDAD979E50CQ36425191-A50A3BFB-BBA6-4925-A622-1F7B5F2FF0D0Q36560791-0B6D1FF4-57F6-42C3-9402-C2AFD4978B03Q36586967-9B81B502-5757-4CC7-AB91-D4A239E4940AQ37120662-E16C7FB3-E51C-4121-9E6A-D80E789237BAQ38042900-7A6FCBC0-0196-4E1B-8C68-78E517CD729FQ38168257-1097D428-2E9A-41FC-AE23-A6938B799AE7Q39233801-F90D2FED-1E70-42DF-9A86-2AEF7DE3F8FFQ39481748-A2938BB8-0513-404C-8440-E86A1BF7EE5AQ40246281-2DCB81A4-1CD2-4DA4-9DF5-6A32569FEF5BQ40680499-060475CA-1902-4848-8E83-886A8DE1DD15Q41466469-FCEFE86D-AABD-4D5F-976E-6CB35A535F27Q42254897-488A8ED4-891E-42C9-B913-30584268FB02Q44420470-D97035CB-1555-4FF8-AF70-BA48C097A520Q45072950-83002168-9817-49E1-8204-18D60B88E8CB
P2860
The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study.
description
1997 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1997年の論文
@ja
1997年学术文章
@wuu
1997年学术文章
@zh
1997年学术文章
@zh-cn
1997年学术文章
@zh-hans
1997年学术文章
@zh-my
1997年学术文章
@zh-sg
1997年學術文章
@yue
1997年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@en
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@nl
type
label
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@en
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@nl
prefLabel
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@en
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
The determinants of trust and ...... unication: an empirical study.
@en
P2093
Covello VT
McCallum DB
P356
10.1111/J.1539-6924.1997.TB00842.X
P577
1997-02-01T00:00:00Z