Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
about
Strategies for imputation to whole genome sequence using a single or multi-breed reference population in cattleComparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.Imputation-Based Whole-Genome Sequence Association Study Rediscovered the Missing QTL for Lumbar Number in Sutai PigsA new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.Imputation of sequence level genotypes in the Franches-Montagnes horse breed.Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattleAccuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.Whole genome SNP genotype piecemeal imputationImpact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeansGenotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.Imputation Accuracy from Low to Moderate Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chips in a Thai Multibreed Dairy Cattle PopulationA 0.5-Mbp deletion on bovine chromosome 23 is a strong candidate for stillbirth in Nordic Red cattle.Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.Justification for setting the individual animal genotype call rate threshold at eighty-five percent.Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.Imputation from SNP chip to sequence: a case study in a Chinese indigenous chicken population.Increasing imputation and prediction accuracy for Chinese Holsteins using joint Chinese-Nordic reference population.Imputation of missing genotypes from low- to high-density SNP panel in different population designs.
P2860
Q28656057-AF66CCDB-AE31-4E3A-8FF6-B9BE1B99F87FQ31008999-E5AF0D75-AC28-4BAF-8C6C-27E7232C316EQ33677649-1259B8C7-6191-4C14-8D3B-70533B0BB809Q33828250-8AC473F9-6D56-471B-AF14-8B79DD561A48Q34270831-DCF4C8CE-EDD9-4BA6-BCA1-B7AA36E4D857Q34316528-D12B19C5-A2A8-4365-9836-715EAFBDC190Q34990929-670DB926-2B72-4565-8C78-E0CB8A8A8359Q35739367-E5DC5BF6-C4B4-45E9-B6DA-63C908B3675CQ35748164-2AB619F1-434F-44EE-8731-939CA0445292Q35820119-4DE65C53-7B90-4E5E-AEA1-F813B9168F8CQ35910259-43753722-8879-4934-9B4C-F4319358DADFQ36294558-F185E174-7436-4214-AA3B-3E8A892B2743Q36661629-50FD5361-0D61-4519-AA8E-652C3C9857EFQ36810752-C9D223DC-F158-492B-8EC1-A573B68AD320Q37587796-16F2E193-8F7B-48B8-9985-A4B0B928497AQ38232111-314F3642-250D-4C1E-9EDB-72410A5C75EFQ39145050-56747264-AE21-4800-8D26-8CCAC1B66CD4Q41965829-9E0E3F9B-9611-4BD4-8E0A-EC5C8E81C109Q42159056-14ACD7E3-A5FC-4F6D-A771-0CA20627E5D0Q45951666-F755CA39-2FAF-4F42-8874-F155D8CF8295Q46563984-9F1FDED7-7AFE-4CE7-855A-E878E7ABDE46Q51415838-8FBA0922-B455-48B4-90C1-B6CB5AF18F04Q51510896-A49E9F3C-B45B-4DA3-9666-85D72C1DF1E1Q53383615-54444FA4-793A-4C78-BD7E-3C27E8D4B510
P2860
Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@en
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@en
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@en
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Comparison of different method ...... wedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.3168/JDS.2012-6316
P407
P577
2013-05-16T00:00:00Z