Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

about

A randomised controlled study of standard versus accelerated deflation of the Terumo radial band haemostasis device after transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterisation.

P2860

Q51147410-E7061EC9-F4A0-4369-AEDF-ED3E0857D6CD

P2860

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50709312

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年学术文章

@wuu

2013年学术文章

@zh

2013年学术文章

@zh-cn

2013年学术文章

@zh-hans

2013年学术文章

@zh-my

2013年学术文章

@zh-sg

2013年學術文章

@yue

2013年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@en

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@nl

type

Item

label

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@en

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@nl

prefLabel

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@en

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

@nl

P1476

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions

@en

P2093

Sanjit Jolly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Feasibility and safety of 7-Fr radial approach for complex PCI.

Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.

Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.

Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.

Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures.

P304

151-158

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

meta-analysis

P356

10.2217/CER.12.79

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Victar Hsieh

P577

2013-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

24236557

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

about

P2860

P2860

Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698