How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50798988

about

Development and use of a research productivity assessment tool for clinicians in low-resource settings in the Pacific Islands: a Delphi study.Effect of the economic crisis on the production of immunology patents managed through the Patent Cooperation Treaty agreement from 2004-2011 Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: a study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research Disease specific productivity of american cancer hospitals Measuring the outcome of biomedical research: a systematic literature review.The research capacity and culture of Australian podiatrists Tackling the "so what" problem in scientific research: a systems-based approach to resource and publication tracking.Poorly cited articles in peer-reviewed cardiovascular journals from 1997 to 2007: analysis of 5-year citation rates Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers.Research capacity and culture in podiatry: early observations within Queensland Health Research and collaboration overview of Institut Pasteur International Network: a bibliometric approach toward research funding decisions.Characterizing scientific production of Italian Oral Surgery professionals through evaluation of bibliometric indices.Research impact of systems-level long-term care research: a multiple case study.Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors.Benchmarking the research track record and level of appointment of Australian occupational therapy academics.Mentoring perception, scientific collaboration and research performance: is there a 'gender gap' in academic medicine? An Academic Health Science Centre perspective.Measuring academic performance for healthcare researchers with the H index: which search tool should be used?Neurosurgeon academic impact is associated with clinical outcomes after clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms Assessing the impact of healthcare research: A systematic review of methodological frameworks.Trends in performance indicators of neuroimaging anatomy research publications: a bibliometric study of major neuroradiology journal output over four decades based on web of science database.Promoting stewardship of academic productivity in emergency medicine: using the h-index to advance beyond the impact factor.

P2860

Q27303842-D124D5A8-1F35-4768-BB57-D8F3B1DED6C1 Q28817121-5CDC02A2-ED36-4BFD-A23A-DA6DEA3980B6 Q30394353-85E99DB1-F485-4E7F-92E7-4E07E5CBB0CD Q34701357-EDE47270-6A88-438B-9602-2978FC712BB3 Q35189592-9820983B-FD94-49E8-837C-11847B03D7CC Q35249369-8FFD0CB5-3CA0-4076-98F8-E20B7B5F2C63 Q35256748-B3EE0EB0-DFC3-40EF-9A55-9D46BF20530C Q35900977-96F76097-6ECB-4BDB-B8D4-E1FE249DBC0F Q36028332-6C166EE9-428B-4D8A-9C4B-29808399FB66 Q36453680-20B23FF7-7019-4C62-A540-ED72A1C0D481 Q36548155-E1F6FBFF-5FE5-4718-B09A-5FD5056C2557 Q37609005-F02DC096-14B0-4838-B648-0427ECC73AFE Q37682578-7CCD29AC-F79F-4C31-879F-6C9355270AD5 Q37715650-2214B318-6DB5-4ED2-BB69-97CAB2C79F86 Q38057674-E6057E67-DDC4-4DB2-96F5-57F853334FFE Q38786550-23865701-19C7-4CC9-AA87-F9314A1F5127 Q39483325-2CF79BF2-532D-44D5-8EE9-0E3FF98011FF Q39555310-E4D1B5B0-658C-4B8D-A836-4DA536C930C7 Q41072097-E83BEA44-C982-47E9-B482-9ED65F074D58 Q41326448-EE79BEEB-B57F-4006-8DE7-9350B11B277D Q46328311-260A1A52-BD02-4E1C-9AA2-DD179DF1F81B Q46384783-9EB82662-B6A7-44BC-AE7C-5FF0B6D1E421

P2860

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50798988

description

2011 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2011年の論文

@ja

2011年学术文章

@wuu

2011年学术文章

@zh

2011年学术文章

@zh-cn

2011年学术文章

@zh-hans

2011年学术文章

@zh-my

2011年学术文章

@zh-sg

2011年學術文章

@yue

2011年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@en

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@nl

type

label

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@en

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@nl

prefLabel

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@en

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@nl

P1433

Q50798988-DC952278-F053-41A4-837A-527B3543C6AB

P1476

Q50798988-CA1F3CC5-496D-4F1A-A418-B86A0859999D

P2093

Q50798988-A1B6BBE9-1335-45D7-883F-E4D6600B13E5

Q50798988-C91350E6-1C5C-4424-A1BB-339A362071B1

Q50798988-FB330203-8328-4B25-9378-331070F8B86F

P2860

Q50798988-03822074-B93A-4751-964A-B88D8417030A

Q50798988-1256F943-6592-4291-B0A1-E0626A72FC70

Q50798988-227A16EA-9898-4512-8472-B466A95BA494

Q50798988-25AE2BC7-A4C6-4ECD-826F-9A5F69FF3074

Q50798988-2712BCDF-E81F-4071-A362-EC2980EE9F9F

Q50798988-30132551-A09D-4B07-BE9C-A0F6FD203B2E

Q50798988-313103C2-9B54-4815-A28D-D09E19D07A82

Q50798988-38D262DA-12A6-4FA2-8C9D-8D88E5B7353C

Q50798988-39175315-B50C-4887-97B7-B472743D9586

Q50798988-3935C4F3-6D82-4188-81F2-7C10EB64CA9F

P304

Q50798988-437F0E5C-49D3-4E50-8A06-46F8FF437F4C

P31

Q50798988-5D1F03A5-E43E-4E57-A443-0B4015D05786

P356

Q50798988-681F223B-B831-4B3E-8AC0-E9EE13296698

P407

Q50798988-1462BAF4-23DA-4406-A5FD-C366E31726D2

P433

Q50798988-AE80D7AB-7976-4E32-A590-0FD11A261E35

P478

Q50798988-D619242B-CBA9-450B-9E0B-B3B47456411B

P50

Q50798988-3562A931-99A3-4272-AFCD-E051B8C1CE72

Q50798988-7258B1BC-B423-40FF-A402-D9E8AAEFBE38

Q50798988-A56D5FE3-3E25-4C91-A353-D2126901795A

Q50798988-B5AFA6EE-171E-4CC3-8E2D-A9D9B5F5C27C

Q50798988-F60820A6-F671-46F7-BC49-4AD9911C4F1B

P577

Q50798988-F1EA2ACA-F385-4099-9D53-0F2DBFF86D51

P5875

Q50798988-BCE1C1E3-A4D1-470A-AF5D-CBE7A1049C35

P698

Q50798988-CB41F870-7A44-4465-9F5F-3B105D45A7A7

P932

Q50798988-EBAE6954-B53F-4FE3-A425-6E22B5CB8E90

P356

JRSM.2011.110005

P1433

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

P1476

How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

@en

P2093

Kamran Ahmed

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sejal Jiwan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vanash M Patel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact.

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

Geographical distribution of publications in the field of medical education

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

Assessment of specialists in cardiovascular practice

Assessing clinical and life sciences performance of research institutions in Split, Croatia, 2000-2006

A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995-2003)

Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research.

P304

251-261

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1258/JRSM.2011.110005

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

104

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Jeremy K. Nicholson

Hutan Ashrafian

Thanos Athanasiou

P577

2011-06-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51206898

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21659400

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3110970

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string