Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
about
Disturbance Regimes Predictably Alter Diversity in an Ecologically Complex Bacterial System.Anthropogenic disturbances are key to maintaining the biodiversity of grasslands.Relocation, high-latitude warming and host genetic identity shape the foliar fungal microbiome of poplars.Conserving and promoting evenness: organic farming and fire-based wildland management as case studies.Scale-dependent effect sizes of ecological drivers on biodiversity: why standardised sampling is not enough.Limited impacts of extensive human land use on dominance, specialization, and biotic homogenization in boreal plant communities.Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem.Tree species richness decreases while species evenness increases with disturbance frequency in a natural boreal forest landscape.Exotic trees modify the thermal landscape and food resources for lizard communities.Response of microcrustacean communities from the surface-groundwater interface to water contamination in urban river system of the Jarama basin (central Spain).Disturbance regime alters the impact of dispersal on alpha and beta diversity in a natural metacommunity.Seasonal variation in black fly (Diptera: Simuliidae) taxocenoses from the Brazilian Savannah (Tocantins, Brazil).The impact of livestock grazing on plant diversity: an analysis across dryland ecosystems and scales in southern Africa.Coexistence of species with different dispersal across landscapes: a critical role of spatial correlation in disturbance.Disturbance Regimes Drive The Diversity of Regional Floristic Pools Across Guianan Rainforest Landscapes.Effects of grazing intensity on pollinator abundance and diversity, and on pollination servicesComplex plant community responses to modifications of disturbance and nutrient availability in productive permanent grasslands
P2860
Q30367340-CED8F251-215C-45B4-952E-2139B46CC191Q30385762-A7BBE743-6C37-45A6-B9DA-4CC9CD869419Q30872820-D5C21C5A-F3E2-4658-AE77-EA9A734C81A2Q34456740-E4139E8F-0B84-415E-A69A-91AAE853F917Q34725514-FD75D5CD-2C9F-4047-B80F-28AFE3465EC1Q35083363-B95C1B08-1186-47FC-88B4-85631A6CD61FQ35097081-420079D4-A553-48C3-ACDA-D184A476027FQ35920450-E5576527-FE76-4055-AA6B-8F5380972C46Q36145281-7A35497B-C49E-4551-AC57-9B74B955BE76Q40096903-127AE8C0-2E1A-4166-ABDC-6DE317F56F61Q46418965-2EAE24A5-9921-488B-8B6C-9F1731AAAF4FQ46810495-286C09BB-C517-4B8A-BC8D-78A09F799FC5Q46847976-D8A671B5-D18B-4450-9FFE-2B9D1CB1AEBCQ51291832-8F35A7E4-B8BC-402A-B972-2FCACA6EFEC1Q54955354-5E67E62A-96E5-455C-9592-B80EE2EB3E90Q57027577-6314FF9F-8AA8-4BFA-99CE-29CA0BB39E9CQ58387191-B1CA3E77-EF5C-4809-96DB-CC1DE7EA5A4F
P2860
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@en
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@nl
type
label
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@en
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@nl
prefLabel
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@en
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested?
@en
P2093
Henrik Pavia
J Robin Svensson
Mats Lindegarth
P2860
P304
P356
10.1098/RSPB.2011.2620
P577
2012-02-01T00:00:00Z