Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
about
Mutualism fails when climate response differs between interacting species.The success of assisted colonization and assisted gene flow depends on phenology.Ectomycorrhizal fungal richness declines towards the host species' range edge.Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies.Differential effectiveness of novel and old legume-rhizobia mutualisms: implications for invasion by exotic legumes.Specialization-generalization trade-off in a Bradyrhizobium symbiosis with wild legume hosts.Mutualistic rhizobia reduce plant diversity and alter community composition.Modelling nutritional mutualisms: challenges and opportunities for data integration.Legume-rhizobium symbiotic promiscuity and effectiveness do not affect plant invasiveness.Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not.Reduced pollinator service and elevated pollen limitation at the geographic range limit of an annual plant.Effects of multiple mutualists on plants and their associated arthropod communities.Role of climate and competitors in limiting fitness across range edges of an annual plant.Strong genetic differentiation but not local adaptation toward the range limit of a coastal dune plant.Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules.Nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities in invasive legume nodules and associated soils are similar across introduced and native range populations in AustraliaHost promiscuity in symbiont associations can influence exotic legume establishment and colonization of novel rangesReduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introducedAcaciaMutualisms are not constraining cross-continental invasion success of Acacia species within AustraliaBiotic interactions affect the elevational ranges of high-latitude plant species
P2860
Q30727866-F5348237-F4B3-4C27-BD90-0A8172C43DFDQ30962848-5D2932FF-DE7A-4875-9C77-BA46D7BBFEEEQ31065433-E378FAF2-BEC8-4780-8EF2-7F1A23FEA850Q31142949-6DDCAFF9-7CD0-4D6F-8B45-F0CF4720A5CBQ34196568-832C53DC-7EE6-4A0B-A5E7-DEBDBB94AD53Q34410735-FC6EEA8A-EDB4-41E0-88A0-B39730EAFC0AQ35269341-625BB0DA-A113-4B96-9ABD-431D612A4144Q38661965-863E82D0-5935-4798-94B9-C7E0DB9C5532Q38860374-DA16772A-142D-4E0E-8010-F09865FF5295Q39021875-2DD7D10C-2E60-4D22-BE4B-0EE360F5100CQ42671335-3E753A39-248C-4921-897E-D50C4FEC5D05Q44264134-F82901E9-C7B1-4A0F-8CB3-7CF6623D869FQ46108420-60CDAD75-DDC5-4F02-B021-D6F4EC9FB6D1Q46430708-EAAE6AAF-7084-42B9-94CE-96B9B1F14335Q46468046-7C494817-4CAB-4856-8F43-5317AB91F612Q46807296-8CD7398A-EEA7-4395-9489-0D197D6A5DABQ56384457-290121DD-B6E6-45E1-8F5C-3F23546AF1ABQ56426811-4D45143D-B846-4755-B1DB-909EB21C68AEQ56481361-C835242D-3A24-4AFD-8D02-88E82A93AB83Q56545129-3C1A3005-9DA8-479E-899E-51995DBDA6E8Q57269860-4CBE9866-D60D-4E66-9C6F-140631D2A588
P2860
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@en
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@nl
type
label
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@en
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@nl
prefLabel
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@en
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?
@en
P2093
Carolyn G Anderson
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00442-011-1958-4
P407
P577
2011-03-06T00:00:00Z