Why only tetraploid Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) became invasive: a common garden comparison of ploidy levels.
about
Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plantsThe more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasionsEcological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery.Time since introduction, seed mass, and genome size predict successful invaders among the cultivated vascular plants of Hawaii.Two sides of the same coin? Rare and pest plants native to the United States and Canada.Conditions in home and transplant soils have differential effects on the performance of diploid and allotetraploid anthericum speciesThe origin of unique diversity in deglaciated areas: traces of Pleistocene processes in north-European endemics from the Galium pusillum polyploid complex (Rubiaceae).Polyploidy can Confer Superiority to West African Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. Trees.Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation.Factors influencing distribution and local coexistence of diploids and tetraploids of Vicia cracca: inferences from a common garden experiment.Response to competition of bulbous geophyte Allium oleraceum differing in ploidy level.Physiological and fitness differences between cytotypes vary with stress in a grassland perennial herb.History vs. legend: Retracing invasion and spread of Oxalis pes-caprae L. in Europe and the Mediterranean area.First evidence for the presence of invasiveSolidago altissima(Asteraceae) in EuropeGrowth, phenology, and biomass allocation of alienSolidagospecies in central EuropeBiogeographic comparisons of herbivore attack, growth and impact of Japanese knotweed between Japan and FranceCONTEMPORARY EVOLUTION DURING INVASIONCytogeography of Oxalis pes-caprae in its native range: where are the pentaploids?
P2860
Q28661140-FFC3FC43-C2DA-4754-8602-1115A2190742Q28741287-7AFEC3E1-80A2-4C87-961A-ECBC5D0B24FBQ33808778-F2F13875-9264-4EE2-9698-907586F5C489Q33846978-A3DF28E9-6DF2-423F-85EF-5869252B506EQ34386479-36924B3B-953D-4D15-86C9-3CC38D69EA2FQ35546424-C0A1E9D9-6C46-4E18-B24C-D9E74A0A0DECQ35560368-21511105-E86F-4872-9429-E1A97F65856AQ36999861-7609D9D3-00E6-4E1C-9F6F-EE6272FE8A39Q38428375-E2F77C1D-F472-459A-BCE2-165380A1C06BQ38909926-823D4CE5-2ED8-439C-ADBC-D76B4B3727D5Q43563391-16F0262B-D918-4E1D-AE9E-63FFD8145A05Q46250995-FCAA3FC2-E545-416B-A215-9A91B9557FD2Q47234011-C0CD06B3-04DA-45BA-AEDA-1E26699B3883Q56333959-EA97B587-D2A9-4F94-BDED-B3D77BBA50C6Q56426438-B255845A-1FCA-468F-8F57-C3DDFEDEB7B9Q56525146-5E9D3494-6DE7-459A-95A1-24714FA22431Q57013618-4F2EF446-731E-47B9-931F-53C50B80B6A7Q57014892-619A050B-7A1A-4247-86BA-0D1CD009284C
P2860
Why only tetraploid Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) became invasive: a common garden comparison of ploidy levels.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Why only tetraploid Solidago g ...... n comparison of ploidy levels.
@en
Why only tetraploid Solidago gigantea
@nl
type
label
Why only tetraploid Solidago g ...... n comparison of ploidy levels.
@en
Why only tetraploid Solidago gigantea
@nl
prefLabel
Why only tetraploid Solidago g ...... n comparison of ploidy levels.
@en
Why only tetraploid Solidago gigantea
@nl
P1433
P1476
Why only tetraploid Solidago g ...... n comparison of ploidy levels.
@en
P2093
Peter J Edwards
Regula Billeter
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00442-010-1595-3
P407
P577
2010-03-18T00:00:00Z